Vineviz
Hello Vineviz
editI left a note/comment for you at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Music_of_Italy after your entry in the discussion. Man, this is a confusing way to communicate. My email address is on my user page if you want. Thank you for the suggestions and comments. Jeffmatt 07:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Music of Italy
editHello, again. At
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Music_of_Italy#My_kingdom_for_an_outline.21
I have put up a proposal for rearranging that article. When you get some time, have a look. Jeffmatt 07:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Empty articles
editArticles you have created of Italian bands are empty and as such are not consistent with Wikipedia:Guide to layout or even Wikipedia:Stub. At a minimum, you should seek to provide essential information (3–10 sentences). Thanks. Accurizer 14:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- I appreciate your comments on the Italian band stubs. I intend to supply at least a little content for each of these stubs (and much more for some), but wanted to get them categorized first so I didn't lose track of them. Vineviz 15:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Music of Italy
editHello, again. Since you have worked on the Music of Italy article, note that it is now on the peer review list (at or near the top of the list) at Wikipedia:Peer review. We'll see what happens to it. I think it looks ok. I see you are interested in Cassino. As in Battle of...? I went up there a couple of weeks ago with a 92-year old friend of mine and veteran of the entire WW2 campaign. We even stopped at San Pietro, site of the famous battle and John Huston film. Jeffmatt 15:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Scholarship removal?
editWhy did you remove the information about the scholarship for University of Cassino. That was relevant information, and is completely factual.
Please respond at xo-alana@hotmail.com
- There is nothing about this scholarship that merits inclusion in an encylopedic article on the town of Cassino. Wiki vanity guidelines are quite clear, in my opinion. Vineviz 18:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Problems With Genetics in Wiki Articles
editThanks for the help on the Cimbri article. I have decided not to mess with any stuff written by that particular party. Too much sound and fury.
Have you had a look at the R1b article lately? It's an incredible jumble. Stevo343 (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Re Niliu, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Re Niliu seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Re Niliu, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
R1b
editHi Vince. I noticed that you have some knowledge of R1b. As you correctly highlighted, ht 35 and 15, so called modal types, are RFLPs. Do you know how ht 35 - the 'Anatolian modal type' discussed by Pericic and Cionnoglu regarding their prevalence in eastern Europe and Anatolia - fit in with the newly discussed subhalogroups of R1b found by Myres and Cruciani ? - L 23 ? Hxseek (talk) 08:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Suggestion: add yourself to the list, and "watch" WP:HGH?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:34, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Can you help with any observations about possible sources for Albania?
editJust in case you can help in this discussion: [1],[2].--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 08:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Banda Cittá Ruvo Di Puglia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- unreferenced music group article of unclear notability; tagged as unreferenced since 2009
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Please be more careful: the content you restored contains a serious BLP violation--that claim is NOT verified in the cited source or anywhere else in the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, Vineviz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Vineviz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of San Joaquin Figs
editHello Vineviz,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged San Joaquin Figs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barabàn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. The article La Lionetta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of La Lionetta for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Lionetta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.