Vincenzo1492

Question

Are you also the user called Anmccaff ? Both of you posted on the same type of articles related to WWII. You edit very very little and out of blue you come from nowhere to support someone who has got exactly the same interests as you. For your record, I have improved the article, your edit summary shows bad faith. I have improved the informations I had included in the article in the legacy section. Carliertwo (talk) 13:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Sor

Sorry for the late reply. Your guesses are mostly wrong:

No, I’m not Anmccaff. BTW: double user accounts are generally not very welcome.

I’m on WP nearly 10 yrs and not out of the blue. But yes, I don’t have the time to edit on a daily basis.

I do NOT have the same interests as Anmccaff. EXACTLY not. My interests are feeded from a total different basis.

I generally do not support someone’s interests (i.e. an user’s interests or views). Also not my personal views. Of course it is not possible to stand back with these 100%. But I support the idea of Wikipedia. (And it irritates me pretty much that your sentence with that wrong guessing intends that we users should support the interests of other users with same interests. That not a good intention for independent and overall knowledge.)

No I am not showing bad faith, when you ignore talk pages. Yes it is ok to critize or discuss edits of other users on a factual basis. From my personal point of view it is arrogant to ignore talk pages AND instead going on with edits. Especially when you were requested NOT to ignore the talks. After this action from you (=ignoring talks) you still expect AGF and blame me for bad faith. Wow, this supports my impression of your behaviour. Or to express in an constructive manner: I would guess that you have to try to improve your exchange and co-operation with other users to achieve a result which does not satisfy you but finally the WP idea and WP community. Enjoy your day and with best wishes from VINCENZO1492 03:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC)