Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Vincent Dicks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Emerson Buckley. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 05:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Emerson Buckley edit

Take a look at the citation for the first reference and format the others in the same way. Thanks.. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Again I ask that you please fix the references so they match the first reference I fixed for you. The work you have done does not add to the quality of the article, is counterproductive, and does not meet WP:MOS. If you need help please let me know. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
The goal is to move the items from the Links section to the references section by embedding in the text section of the article, not adding it directly to the section. Again, if you need help, let me know. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

March 2009 edit

 

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Emerson Buckley worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 12:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Harry Potter Title Changes edit

I've used my rollback powers to revert 4 of your edits regarding the title of the first movie. We are going with the English title, not the American one. This is long-time policy. Please see the article's talk section if you have further questions, thanks. Jusdafax 04:25, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Van Salsbergen House edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Van Salsbergen House, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 18:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Van Salsbergen House edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Van Salsbergen House, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.registerstar.com/articles/2010/06/26/news/doc4c2576c79ed23724752279.txt. As a copyright violation, Van Salsbergen House appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Van Salsbergen House has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Max Semenik (talk) 19:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

CCI Notice edit

Hello, Vincent Dicks. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Max Semenik (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Van Salsbergen House edit

Hello,

Thanks for your article about the Van Salsbergen House! It looks like an interesting house!

The content appears to be Wikipedia:Copy-paste from this article, and the sections of the article have been tagged as such. This can be remedied by paraphrasing the content. You may want to see WP:Close paraphrasing.

I hope this helps!--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:49, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I just noticed that this was the second attempt to add the article with copyrighted material. If the content can be paraphrased, it can stay. Otherwise, this attempt will have to be deleted as well.--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

References for Pratt Homestead edit

  Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Pratt Homestead are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/THOMAS MOSER, Tenor. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 12:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  21:12, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  02:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Moser concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Moser, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 09:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission Thomas Moser edit

 

Hello Vincent Dicks. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Thomas Moser.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Moser}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Reply