Vimalraj Selvakumar

Replaceable fair use File:Jasminbhasin.png

Thanks for uploading File:Jasminbhasin.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Twinkle Taneja.png

Thanks for uploading File:Twinkle Taneja.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 17:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, Vimalraj Selvakumar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 13:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate templates

Hi there, any reason why you created two (basically) duplicate templates?

• Template:Golden Petal Awards
• Template:Colors Golden Petal Awards

What's the difference between these? Why do we need both? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi sir, I mistakenly created Template:Golden Petal Awards. Now I contest it for speedy deletion. Thank you. Vimalraj Selvakumar (talk) 21.02, 11 October 2017 (IST)

Block evasion

Why are you evading your block with this account? It's obvious. —SpacemanSpiff 15:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Sir please forgive me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vimalraj Selvakumar (talk • contribs) 15:48, October 11, 2017 (UTC)

Vimalraj Selvakumar, what was the name of your original account? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

You are continuing to edit but not answering this question, your editing privileges will be revoked soon. —SpacemanSpiff 16:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for self confirmed block evasion, likely sock of Jaswanthvijay, advertising only.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 17:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vimalraj Selvakumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19473 was submitted on Oct 12, 2017 01:28:45. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vimalraj Selvakumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19477 was submitted on Oct 12, 2017 12:19:12. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vimalraj Selvakumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Respected Administrator, When my account Li wei ran have been blocked in Tamil Wikipedia for 6 months I try to request for unblocking. But I cannot edit my talk page and cannot use unblock ticket request system on Tamil wiki. So I create a new account Vimalraj Selvakumar and edits pages on Tamil wiki. Now I understood that it is a big mistake as creating multiple accounts on the wiki is a sockpuppetry. Hereafter I shall not create any more accounts on the wiki. I kindly request the administrator to unblock my account. Thank you.Vimalraj Selvakumar (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I see at least 13 socks you created - doesn't look like the picture you're describing. You need to address these if you're interested in getting unblocked. Max Semenik (talk) 01:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vimalraj Selvakumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Respected Wikipedia Administrator, I accept my mistake on creating many multiple accounts (sockpuppetry). Kindly forgive my mistake. User:Vimalraj Selvakumar is my true account now. Hereafter, I shall not create any new accounts and shall not violate rules and regulations of Wikipedia. But my account have been blocked indefinitely. That's a big punishment for me. I read on Wikipedia that blocking is not a punishment, it is only for understanding mistake of a person. Now I understand my mistake. So I kindly request you to give me a second chance. Thank you. Vimalraj Selvakumar (talk) 03:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As per below, talk page access revoked. I suggest you try the WP:STANDARDOFFER, stay away for at least six months without creating any more socks and then ask at WP:UTRS to have your talk page access reinstated so you can make a new request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• THis disruption of yours has gone on in three projects that I know of (I'm not familiar enough with Wikidata), and at ta.wiki, Commons and here, you've been independently blocked by different people for creating the same level of disruption. It is clear that you haven't a clue what an encylopaedia is and are stuffing articles here with your copyvios and advertorials. I don't think you should be unblocked. —SpacemanSpiff 04:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

• And right after posting the above unblock notice, you created another sock -- Ranji Weimali (talk · contribs · logs). I'm not going to review this unblock request, but, if not done by someone else, I'll revoke your talk page access soon. —SpacemanSpiff 10:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Respected Administrator, I did not create User:Ranji Weimali. It is the account of my brother, who shared my same IP address on hotspot. You blocked me from creating account. Then how could I create a new account? Please understand me. Thank you. Vimalraj Selvakumar (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vimalraj Selvakumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19485 was submitted on Oct 13, 2017 10:59:37. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)