Vikhyat Dubey Virat Brothers

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Vikhyat Dubey Virat Brothers", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it gives an impression of a group or entity editing with this username. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 13:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GreaterPonce665. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Videocon Group seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 15:58, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 15:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Videocon Group, you may be blocked from editing. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 22:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 12:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite partial block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Videocon Group, and (added:) Talk:Videocon Group, for persistent addition of unsourced content. And for WP:SPAM.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 13:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikhyat Dubey Virat Brothers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

'Unblocking that I'm doing on Videocon Group is hiding blocker that viewing source will be safe. I think he made a mistake so I'm promising not to block this page Yamla (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)'

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikhyat Dubey Virat Brothers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

'The page I was unblocking is appealing with our talk page coming to ready for not blockking page. I think it was a mistake but it was ANI discussion331dot (talk) 11:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)'

Decline reason:

This request is also incoherent. If English is not your primary langauge, you may feel more comfortable editing the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. You have not addressed the reason for the block. As such, I have made the block sitewide. 331dot (talk) 11:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ANI discussion regarding your conduct

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 13:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikhyat Dubey Virat Brothers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to unblock all pages and stop blocking for people and tell them not to block all pages. I have unblocked and send edit request.

Decline reason:

That makes no sense whatsoever. Talk page access removed. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:49, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikhyat Dubey Virat Brothers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL^{Query me!} 11:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vikhyat Dubey Virat Brothers, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 14:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)