If you have any questions to my contribution please free feel to ping me.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Examity Proctoring (November 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Vijayabhaskarjatoth! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Examity Proctoring (November 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Vijayabhaskarjatoth! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Examity Proctoring edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Examity Proctoring, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I request you to check through the article references and research I made to contribute, as it is written in neutral point of view. Also I made variable research regarding one of the best Online Proctoring company in the world. Hope am following Wikipedia policies. Requesting other administrators to look around the corner. Vijayabhaskarjatoth (talk) 04:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Vijayabhaskarjatoth! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article creation help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vijayabhaskarjatoth/sandbox edit

 

The article Vijayabhaskarjatoth/sandbox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lunacats (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nutana Mohan for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nutana Mohan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutana Mohan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bearcat (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiran Abbavaram (August 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Vijayabhaskarjatoth/Kiran Abbavaram edit

  Hello, Vijayabhaskarjatoth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Vijayabhaskarjatoth/Kiran Abbavaram, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Vijayabhaskarjatoth/Kiran Abbavaram edit

 

Hello, Vijayabhaskarjatoth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kiran Abbavaram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply