Welcome!

edit

Hello, Vidhee2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Sargun Kaur.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Sargun Kaur.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Images may be subject to copyright.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sargun Kaur

edit
 

The article Sargun Kaur has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Chhavi Pandey.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Chhavi Pandey.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Sargun Kaur.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Sargun Kaur.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Vidhee Mandhub

edit
 

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Under section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sid95Q (talk) 02:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shyam Mashalkar

edit

Hello Vidhee2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shyam Mashalkar for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Isingness (talk) 21:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Pankaj Vishnu.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Pankaj Vishnu.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Raj Premi

edit
 

The article Raj Premi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mar11 (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Advice

edit

Please do not create any further articles without first reading Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Deb (talk) 16:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Download (3).jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Download (3).jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pankaj Vishnu

edit

Hello, Vidhee2. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Pankaj Vishnu, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Pankaj Vishnu to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:11, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Rahul-Sharma.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Rahul-Sharma.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Hhjj.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Hhjj.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 09:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:4F4RYrtR 400×400.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:4F4RYrtR 400×400.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kaal Bhairav Rahasya, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sid95Q (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kaal Bhairav Rahasya. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. We don't use such terminology as per WP:TVCAST and WP:ANTAGONIST Sid95Q (talk) 08:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Vidhee2 I am requesting you again Please read this message [1] on WP:TVCAST and it will solve all your queries.Sid95Q (talk) 08:51, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Interpretive labels

edit

Hi Vidhee2, though your efforts are appreciated, it would be helpful if you'd please refrain from adding interpretive labels like antagonist/protagonist, lead, etc. as you've done here. The WikiProject Television community prefers that editors not do this. What you consider a parallel lead might actually be considered a lead by the producers, and it's not our job to make these distinctions of our own interpretation. If you want to make it clear which characters are the antagonists, you should do so by writing prose descriptions about the characters that deliver the information in context. "John is a jealous business owner who seeks revenge on Jack after Jack has an affair with John's wife." That sort of thing.

Even from a practical perspective, in a section marked "Main", calling someone a "Main lead" would be triply redundant, as we already know they're main cast, and we can probably assume they are leads. We could also surmise that the name(s) at the top of the list are probably more important, assuming they were ordered by the on-screen credits. We also don't need to be informed of gender, because we have eyes and can probably figure out who the males and females are.

Please note that WP:TVCAST is the set of guidelines you should be following, as this represents widespread community consensus. And if you're interested in seeing a quality article that deals well with character and cast descriptions, please see List of Millennium characters. This is the goal we should be working towards. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:08, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kaal Bhairav Rahasya, you may be blocked from editing. this is not a valid subsection as per WP:TVCAST Sid95Q (talk) 10:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:46, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kaal Bhairav Rahasya. Sid95Q (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 15:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:OSlslmYiOiJqcGcifQ.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Manual of Style for television and other community preferences

edit

Vidhee2, this edit, where you again install protagonist/antagonist labels are not consistent with WikiProject Television community preferences. Feel free to ask at WT:TV if you want confirmation. The community prefers that this information be delivered with sufficient context as in the example I gave you the last time I brought this up. See List of Millennium characters as an example. You will notice that nobody is labeled as a protagonist, yet it is clear who the most important characters are, and who are not as important. Please adhere to this, as your repeated edits have become disruptive.

This edit, where you stuff cast/characters into a "Former(Dead)Cast" section is also problematic, because it is inconsistent with WP:TVCAST, a guideline I've brought to your attention before. We care about the entire history of a TV show's cast, not just the most current cast. Cast members don't cease to be of academic importance simply because the cast member has left the series or that the character has been written off. Cast should be organised based on how they were introduced into the series, with new cast being added to the bottom of the Main and Recurring cast. This means that if a lead character is killed off in episode 100 and a replacement lead is brought in in the next episode, that new lead would be added to the bottom of the Main cast list, even if it means they are beneath subordinate characters. We would then use prose to indicate that they were brought in to replace the other character.

Our Manual of Style for Television is the bible you should be editing in accordance with, as it represents long-standing community preferences for how articles should be shaped. Since you have now been given the tools to edit constructively, please note that any further deviations will be considered disruptive. I also strongly recommend you use the article's talk page to ask questions or to discuss and controversial changes. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
For repeatedly adding ridiculous, repetitious language and interpretive content like "Main Female Lead Protagonist", as you did here after being fully apprised of the problems with this phrasing, and for disruptively blanking another editor's user page as you did in these three, presumably deliberate edits. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oh, when your block expires, you are welcome to make constructive edits, but since you've kept adding this problematic content, this will be off-limits. Your recourse when other editors respond negatively to content you add, is to open a discussion on the article's talk page and seek consensus for inclusion, not edit-war over the issue. I also strongly recommend you start responding to discussions that have been opened up on your talk page, because your silent changes convey apathy toward the community. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vidhee2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i am not using multiple accounts and neel mandhub is not my sockpuppet. i was blocked for using multiple accounts which is false and has no evidence. so please unblock me

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 14:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.