Welcome!

edit
Hello, Victoriakereszi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

February 2011

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Workforce Development Institute has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BQ4cystEt4, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cqc74BDCZDQ, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql0MrSMlR28. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Zoeanne edphoto1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Armbrust WrestleMania XXVII Undertaker 19–0 20:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:EdPhoto.JPG

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:EdPhoto.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have been given permission from Zoeann Murphy the photographer for the use of this image. I downloaded it from www.wdiny.org Can you please restore it? Victoriakereszi (talk) 20:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)victoriakeresziReply

File source problem with File:WDI Logo with name jpeg format.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:WDI Logo with name jpeg format.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:57, 5 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have been given permission to use this logo from The Workforce Development Institute who owns the copyright and downloaded it from www.wdiny.org. Can you please restore? Victoriakereszi (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)victoriakeresziReply

Conflict of interest?

edit

  Hello Victoriakereszi. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Workforce Development Institute, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. – Ajltalk 10:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello Aj I no longer work for this organization, but made this page because I value the life and work of Ed Murphy. This is a neutral article. I have done all of the research and feel strongly that this flag should be taken off. Thanks. Victoriakereszi (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)victoriakeresziReply

File source problems

edit

Unfortunately, just claiming that you have permission from the photographer is not enough for the images to be undeleted.

To address your concerns:

  1. For a work downloaded from the internet, please understand that the vast majority of images from the internet are not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.[1]
  2. If the photographer has licensed their image under the GFDL, an acceptable Creative Commons license, or has released their image into the public domain, this permission must be documented.[1]

Hope this helps a little. – Ajltalk 03:21, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Aj. I will speak to the photographer about the image and copyright issues. Victoriakereszi (talk) 04:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC)victoriakeresziReply

Ed Murphy article wikification

edit

Ms. Kereszi: Regarding your question left at the Ed Murphy talk page to me which I am answering here, be advised that I have wikified the article for now to the best of my ability. To better help you create and edit articles I recommend reviewing WP:Biographies of living persons, WP:Notability, WP:FANSITE, WP:Conflict of Interest and WP:Original Research. Also, please try and remember to sign your name on all your talk page comments by using four tildes (~~~~). Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 12:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Robert: Um, interjecting here. She did sign her comments on the talk page, she just... wasn't logged on. So I suppose I'll restate your comment about signatures below. Also, I've refactored your reference links to the guidelines and policies to be more informative.
Ms. Kereszi: Please make sure you sign in before leaving a comment. Also, when you place ~~~~ on your comments, it automatically replaces it with your username (and also in this case, your name), which means you don't have to type ~~~~victoriakereszi just ~~~~. Hope this helps you! – Ajltalk 15:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


Thanks. As you see I am new to this Victoriakereszi (talk) 16:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


Hello, can someone please repsond regarding my recent changes? I read a past comment from RMS125a@hotmail.com comparing the article to a blog, so I am going to make edits that will take away this vibe. The article was never intended to be used for promotion, yet I see your concerns. Can someone please check this to see if I have remedied the problem? I appreciate it Victoriakereszi (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello Victoria. The article looks fine to me. 122.148.229.44 (talk) 04:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply