Welcome! edit

Hello, VictoriaAve, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Alexbrn (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Socking edit

  Hello, VictoriaAve, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.--VVikingTalkEdits 14:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello. edit

I don't use multiple accounts to edit. I tried to edit the article about Johanna Budwig when there were incorrect facts in the intro, but this did not go as it was not approved. I then tried to create a user to see if that was the problem. It seems that wikipedia deliberately does not let anyone edit the wrong facts about Johanna Budwig - is there a reason for this? The intro states that her hypothesis was not scientifically proven, but this is completely wrong. It is confirmed through scientific research article that it is correct. Hope the last two sentences in the intro are removed immediately. These are the two sentences: “Based on her research on fatty acids, she developed a diet that she believed was useful in the treatment of cancer. There is no evidence that these or other "anti-cancer" diets are effective. » VictoriaAve (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

VictoriaAve, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi VictoriaAve! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 October 2019 (UTC)