November 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mike Bickle, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. TeapotgeorgeTalk 22:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mike Bickle edit

Hi Vertigo,

I removed what you wrote on Mike Bickle earlier today. I think that Notable endorsers and their reasons for endorsing his ministry should be summarized, instead of listing out everything they have said. It will read much easier that way. Also, you added a decent amount of information to the page without adding any new sources. It didn't look like the sources already in the article covered the information that you added. Whenever you add new information to an article, please be sure to cite a reliable source and take care to avoid adding original research. It looks like there is a decent amount of information in the existing sources that could be added. Thanks, Qrsdogg (talk) 00:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply