File:Dil Ki Baatein Dil Hi Jaane.jpg

edit
 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Adhurikahani.jpg

edit
 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Hassan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have fixed the problem.(Vermillionhope (talk) 11:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC))Reply

Hello

edit

--Amrev (talk) 21:46, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vaishnavi Rao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Vaishnavi Rao moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Vaishnavi Rao, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed, Rosguill talk 16:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi,@Rosguill I have created this article. She had done many shows but due to lack of notable sources i am requesting for deletion.

Request for Unblock

edit

@DeltaQuad:

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vermillionhope (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I had been blocked can you define the reasons for the block. If i had made any mistakes in editing please tell me.I will not commit it again as I mentioned here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vermillionhope

Decline reason:

Please make any unblock requests from your primary account. Yunshui  07:35, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui:Hi, this is my primary account name Vermillionhope.(Vermillionhope (talk) 08:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC))Reply

The investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw disagrees. Yunshui  08:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Yunshui: According to this [[1]] Yes, I was creating the page Akshay Mhatre but due to error i have to leave that page. So, I didn't able to create it.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vermillionhope (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, can the block be reconsider. Here, is the reasons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vermillionhope#Request_for_Unblock Explained. Please go through the above situation.

Decline reason:

You are a confirmed sockpuppet. Yamla (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vermillionhope (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I am accused of Sockpuppet so let me clarify it. firstly I would like to clarify that my account had been created via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Request_an_account process where I had mentioned all the details that required. Secondly, there might be same IP range problem that things went misinterpreted.

Although, I have made some edit mistake while editing Akshay Mhatre page. Which I accept it. For rest of the edit I had explained the reasons here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vermillionhope#Request_for_Unblock kindly go through the situation.

I have joined few months ago and i am learning the process. And if there was any edit mistake you should have told to me as i had mentioned on my user page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vermillionhope kindly go through my user page. I apologize for the error happen and accept not to commit it in future as well.

Decline reason:

You apologize for the error and say that you didn't do what this account is blocked for. That doesn't both work at the same time. Regarding "same IP range problem", it would be quite a coincidence if you shared an IP range with other editors who are interested in just the same topics but are totally unconnectd with you. Of course, the technical evidence comprises more than just IPs anyway. Huon (talk) 19:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked. Enough time's been wasted here. --Yamla (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vermillionhope (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23080 was submitted on Oct 30, 2018 08:14:20. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 08:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 00:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke

edit

The article Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply