=

[

{




[ [

CS1 error on Cippus Perusinus edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cippus Perusinus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023 edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Pyrgi Tablets. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on talk pages or project pages such as the Teahouse. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

ok got it. 2403:580B:C86:1:28EA:11AB:D0C4:26C6 (talk) 10:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ok , What happens to my posts in sandbox. wiki only has three Etruscan sites and some of my posts are not relative to that. 2403:580B:C86:1:28EA:11AB:D0C4:26C6 (talk) 12:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately, Velthuru is not 'contributing' to Etruscan sites, but vandalizing them: deleting well sourced material and replacing them with his unsourced (and mostly demonstrably wrong) speculation. Please advise him/her that further such vandalism could result in being banned from Wikipedia (again).Johundhar (talk) 15:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
MATERIAL FROM CITATIONS WONT CUT IT , YOU ARE ,IN MANY CASES REPEATING SOMEONE ELSES ERRORS , YOU NEED BI-LINGUAL MATERIAL TO SUPPORT YOUR DIALOGUE, WISHY WASHY ' TENTIVE INTERPRETATIONS' ARE PURE SPECUILATION, i DEAL IN FACTS Velthuru (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
So you are admitting that you refuse to cite any sources for any of your speculations. Please review the rules for posting material to Wikipedia pages. This is not a place for your speculations. If you are sure that your ideas have merit, get them published in a peer reviewed journal. Then they can be mentioned here and cited. But till then, please desist from further vandalizing articles. That behavior will get you banned. Thank you.Johundhar (talk) 11:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Warning: You will be blocked from editing in Wikipedia for disruptive editing edit

Disruptive editing is defined as "persistently editing a page or set of pages with information which is not verifiable through reliable sources"

It is cause for getting blocked, especially when repeated and persistent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing

Desist from these disruptive behaviors and stop vandalizing Etruscan sites to avoid getting blocked.Johundhar (talk) 11:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stop kicking at the traces,all I publish is Truth,using other people's sources and using it as your own as wiki does could be considered plagerism. 2403:580B:C86:1:85F9:BE55:8E0F:11C2 (talk) 18:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I dont know what your qualifications are but I don't think at a level where you can edit mt posts.
The interpretations I see on the sites I vist are pure drivvel. 2403:580B:C86:1:85F9:BE55:8E0F:11C2 (talk) 20:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
quoting a lot of academic names does not make it right. Michael Ventris was not an academic but was interested in languages, he could speak a couple, but his interest led him to decipher the Knossos tablets of Crete. 2403:580B:C86:1:85F9:BE55:8E0F:11C2 (talk) 20:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
these are the main sources I use : 2403:580B:C86:1:85F9:BE55:8E0F:11C2 (talk) 01:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Your own philosophy of what the "Truth" is (not to mention of what "plagerism" [sic] is), is irrelevant here. You are attempting to contribute to a site, Wikipedia, that has rules for what is added to it. If you don't like those rules, you are perfectly free to go make your own blog and expound whatever 'truth' you want from whatever sources you want. But, again, this site has rules. I did not make them up. And if you persistently violate those rules, especially by vandalizing sites, you are going to get blocked from doing any more editing. You have now been warned numerous times about this.Johundhar (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I dont vandalize sites , I use cross sections from one text to
another yo make the meaning more understandable. There are no to support my work, I thought the penny might have dropped by now. I dont know if you get paid for this but if you do you might show me how to get into the monet end of the business. Velthuru (talk) 13:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Are you acknowledging that you have been adding original research to Wikipedia? —C.Fred (talk) 13:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
original research please explain , are you looking for some pretext against me , my name is not Donald trump. 2403:580B:C86:1:4C6A:5234:3520:45F9 (talk) 02:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't care what your name is. Stop vandalizing Etruscan wiki sites, please.Johundhar (talk) 00:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I take it you earn your money off these sites , I am allowed to add notes. and you appear to know nothing about the Etruscan language. 2403:580B:C86:1:DC37:4F7E:87D7:4EAA (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
The wsource I use has 10 thousand inscriptions and I would back it against anytime. 2403:580B:C86:1:DC37:4F7E:87D7:4EAA (talk) 06:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
It would be good if we can work together if you establish a site for the Etruscan language, I can supplt the texts. You might increase yourearnings with those 3 dollar donations. 2403:580B:C86:1:8D7C:69B9:7F4D:71CF (talk) 00:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you have a section with the heading REWIEWS people could leave there opinion even if you dont aggree with it. It would attract more traffic to your site and more revinue , as it seems now you are just promoting yourself and not letting anybody comment. You might put the text of the cippus in PDF so it cant be vandalized. Velthuru (talk) 01:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply