User talk:Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h/Archive 25

Modern Talking

Please see the instructions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals. One person does not a Wiki Project make, see [[1]]. I have removed your template and moved your project pages into userspace. If this project gets support, then you can move them into mainspace. In the meantime, please do not add the template to any articles. Thank you.

Template: Streets of Greater St. Louis

(Jordan S. Wilson (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)) No It's not all of them I need to find the maps first.

Microsoft Word

Hello. Just wanted to let you know that I have declined [2] your protection request for the Microsoft Word article. Additionally Wikipedia's official policy on Image use indicates that icons should be in svg format (which is presumably why Microsoft Excel, Microsoft PowerPoint, etc. have icons in the correct, preferred image format), so I am somewhat troubled by the fact that you have twice reverted ([3], [4]) the article back to your own uploaded png version. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much for holiday greetings! I wish you all the best and I hope that you have a nice christmas.  Ilyushka88 Talk to me 07:53, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you :) --MisterWiki talk contribs 11:53, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Michael Dobson

Could you please explain why you think that the Michael Dobson (author) page reads like an advertisement? Twice now you've reverted with no explanation at all. Simply placing a template on a page and walking away isn't necessarily very helpful. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 01:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. I read it. --MisterWiki talk contribs 01:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
OK, I know you added it again, but why? I mean, I'll even take the little's explanation to mean that you have a valid reason. Just give me a sentence, a phrase, a few words... anything. Try as I might, I can't understand why you think the article in its current state reads as an advertisement, and you haven't given me any clues to go by. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 01:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
I was clicking Random Page and the page appeared. So it appeared like an advertisement of a unknown person for me, so I tagged it. --MisterWiki talk contribs 01:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Ok, well, that's something of an insight to your thought process then. I'd like to seek out a third opinion though, and I'll drop the subject based on what they have to say. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 01:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi! I have provided a third opinion for this dispute at Talk:Michael Dobson (author). Please discuss it further there. Thanks! Mildly MadTC 02:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

OK. --MisterWiki talk contribs 03:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Hey MisterWiki! Just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas. Cheers, archanamiya · talk 19:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. :) --MisterWiki talk contribs 03:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Polargeo's RfA

Would you mind responding to Juliancolton's question at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Polargeo? It's right below your oppose vote. 71.224.248.67 (talk) 03:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

  Done --MisterWiki talk contribs 03:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Amateur radio pics

Your photo has once again been removed from the amateur radio operator page per the comments left on the talk page. Please do not continue to add your pictures to the page against the wishes of other editors. This is bordering on disruptive. Huntster (t @ c) 22:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Rollback usage

Please be careful when using rollback. You can see at WP:ROLLBACK that (with rare exceptions) it is only to be used to rollback obvious vandalism. If you have to explain to someone why an edit is vandalism, then it is not obvious vandalism, and rollback should not be used. In the last four days, you have used rollback several times, including these inappropriate cases: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Prior to #6, you added an {{advert}} tag to Michael Dobson (author) (with no explanation other than "Added {{advert}} tag to article using Friendly"). An editor then undid your edit with summary "rvt - could you explain that a little better, please? I don't see how anything here is advertising anything", and you then reverted the undo with no explanation. Rollback must not be used for cases like that. Johnuniq (talk) 03:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

OK, sorry, I will be more careful using rollback :) --MisterWiki talk contribs 03:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
I note that you continue to use the revert rollback feature to revert content edits: [5], [6]; as well as the revert feature of Twinkle: [7], [8]. The latter two diffs could also be interpreted as personal attacks, given that the edit summaries assert that certain edits are vandalism. I suggest you closely study WP:NPA, WP:EW, and WP:REVERT unless you want to find yourself losing access to tools. — ækTalk 23:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy message to blocked user

Why did you add a "happy" message to User talk:Coastergeekperson04? The user has not contributed since July and is blocked. Your happy message is a very short distance below a prominent "This user has been blocked indefinitely" box. Are you using a bot to add messages to talk pages? I noticed this while participating in an MfD discussion. Johnuniq (talk) 06:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

No, I'm not using a bot. --MisterWiki talk contribs 14:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Also, I was warned about the bot using, I can't use one. I can't venture me because a simple happy holidays or birthday or whatever else message. Also, I don't know of a bot that could do that (add happy birthday messages). --MisterWiki talk contribs 19:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)