Welcome Van00220!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,371,985 registered editors!
Hello Van00220. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
    Introduction to Wikipedia
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Editing tutorial
    How to edit a page
    Simplified Manual of Style
    The basics of Wikicode
    How to develop an article
    How to create an article
    Help pages
    What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
    Do be bold
    Do assume good faith
    Do be civil
    Do keep cool!
    Do maintain a neutral point of view
    Don't spam
    Don't infringe copyright
    Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
    Don't commit vandalism
    Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
    Ask a question
or you can:
    Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
    Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
    Fight vandalism
    Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
    Help contribute to articles
    Perform maintenance tasks
           
    Become a member of a project that interests you
    Help design new templates
    Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)Reply

Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asian Canadians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:West Asian Canadians edit

Hello, why did you use the " " sortkey everywhere? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not sure what exactly you mean but if I made a mistake, please feel free to correct it. (Van00220 (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC))Reply
Sorry; I mean that you categorised the articles into the mentioned categories with [[Category:West Asian Canadians| ]], which sorts article as if they were named " ". I was asking if this was deliberate or not, as Category:East Asian Canadian and similar categories didn't do that. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I see. It wasn't deliberate; that was a mistake on my part. (Van00220 (talk) 02:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC))Reply
Thanks! I fixed it. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:13, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 25 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Canadians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages European people and British Canadians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requesting some help edit

Hi,

It seems recently you have been editing about Persian and South Asian language relations. I had Initiated two articles Draft:Aurats (word) and Aurats. Kindly do have a look at those articles, and if topic interests you, a request to expand these articles with refs.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 06:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Northwestern European Canadians for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northwestern European Canadians, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwestern European Canadians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 24 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Asian Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 8 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Canadians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Canadians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kambojas into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I've copied sources from other wiki pages a few other times, but I will definitely remember to provide attribution should the need arise in future edits/contributions. Van00220 (talk) 22:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Pakistan Star edit

  The Pakistan Star
Great work on Pakistan related articles! You do fantastic work on Karachi. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 04:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Pashtuns edit

Dear User:Van00220, I hope you are doing well. Please keep an eye on the Pashtuns article. Despite the consensus on the talk page, User:Hercules298 (who I suspect is a sockpuppet of User:W28394) has been tampering with the infobox. There have been other problematic edits as well. You are welcome file an SPI if you feel called to do so. With regards, AnupamTalk 00:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I apologize that in the major revert I made, helpful information you added was removed. Feel free to kindly restore your edits. With regards, AnupamTalk 00:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for letting me know. I will have a look and restore my previous edit. Van00220 (talk) 00:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
User:Khestwol and User:PashtoPromoter, as both of you have made several constructive contributions to the article, please have a look too. Thanks, AnupamTalk 04:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request) edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of Punjab into Punjabis. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up! Most of this occurring recently has been between pages with my own contributions with text and/or sources I originally wrote and/or attached, and not other users. I've always tried to be careful and always give source attributions to any text and/or sources I have copied from one page to another that wasn't my original contribution though. Apologies if I forgot to attribute anything (text/sources) that I hadn't originally contributed. Van00220 (talk) 23:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

It's not easy for me to confirm who wrote what parts of what articles. Sorry for any extraneous notices. — Diannaa (talk) 23:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
No worries, it's a good reminder!Van00220 (talk) 23:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
As you have continued vandalising my changes to Sikhism by Country, I guess you want some validification, I published a national estimate, leave it as the Official Census will be published on the 29th November, also my estimate source was used by the Times Of India in an article so please stop vandalising. I know you love Canada. I get it. 81.103.145.160 (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
You have not provided a single census source for the edited population figures. Will continue to revert the edits until you do so.Van00220 (talk) 22:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Apart from the Canadian one and maybe one or 2 others, the vast majority including the USA has used estimates, do you really think that they have exactly 700,000 sikhs, are you even Sikh? SirSpyro45 (talk) 18:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Estimates still require sources. This would not be an issue if you provide a source for the population estimate on the edited page(s).Van00220 (talk) 20:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thats done now SirSpyro45 (talk) 19:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 10 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Punjabi Canadians
added a link pointing to Circa
South Asian Canadians
added a link pointing to Circa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 17 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Punjabi Canadians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 24 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Canadian nationality law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Canadians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mass charts being added all over edit

Pls see Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Mass charts being added all over Moxy-  16:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign born, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 14 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North-West Frontier Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assimilation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

Please stop making the same errors again and again in your demographic table additions to BC-related articles. Don't use a colspan of 15 when most of tables you are adding stuff to have 11, not 15, columns, add "sortbottom" everywhere it's needed, use {{abbr}} for "n.i.e." and similar abbreviations, don't add hard linebreaks between "panethnic" and "group" (or anywhere, really), and don't capitalize "multiracial" when it's not the start of a heading. Here's my latest cleanup of one of your edits. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

No problem. I have a blank template already written out as I've been gradually adding them onto most division and subdivision pages in Canada, so I'll make those changes. Cheers. Van00220 (talk) 00:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! —Joeyconnick (talk) Joeyconnick (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 20 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikhism in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Vancouver.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Scarborough, Ontario edit

Scarborough, Ontario has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:West Asian diaspora in Canada has been nominated for merging to Category:Middle Eastern diaspora in Canada edit

 

Category:West Asian diaspora in Canada has been nominated for merging to Category:Middle Eastern diaspora in Canada. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

  Hi Van00220! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Radcliffe Line several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Radcliffe Line, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I have added a new discussion to the talk page instead. Van00220 (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 11:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply