Usernine

Welcome!

Hello, Usernine, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as United States Civilian Forces, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United States Civilian Forces

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on United States Civilian Forces requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Cahk (talk) 08:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Which editor did I attack? Evidence? Usernine (talk) 09:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC) Usernine (talk) 09:17, 12 November 2016 (UTC)usernine

@Usernine: Me. "Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence" is considered to be personal attack. You said on my talk page "You want to suppress this page", "He has called you over to delete it for him" and " Don't run this like a mafia." All those statements, broadly construed, are personal attacks against me.--Cahk (talk) 09:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

If admins bully new editors like this and make egoistic threats then how is it not a figurative mafia way of operating? The evidence is your own behavior. Reread your statements. You don't want the page to exist. You want it deleted as per your statement and action. That is documented. As far as him calling you over or vice versa, explain how you BOTH got alerted to my page within seconds of me posting the first edit? What is the statistical probability of that? The claim by you that it was not a coordinated attack is highly questionable. The fact is you BOTH violated the stated rules,

"Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation."

I wasn't done. Usernine (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)usernine

@Usernine: Jimfbleak went extensive length to explain to you why the page was deleted. Instead of reading his and my comments on my talk page to you, you have insisted that we have some hidden agenda against the subject matter. Since you are a newbie, and in my effort to be extremely civil, let me explain to you how Wikipedia works. For one, I am not an administrator. I am a new page patroller. As soon an article is created, it is categorized on the Special:NewPagesFeed for everyone to review. If I had not tagged the article, another patroller would have done it within a few minutes. Secondly, your "movement" fails the notability test. Google News = 0 result. G6oogle Search = 28 results, mostly twitter messages (and your latest Wikipedia edits). Your personal twitter account is not a source. There are also issues of WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:Significance among others. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't understand how Wikipedia works. However, if you continue to make baseless accusation against me, I will report you to AIV.--Cahk (talk) 10:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Warning

You can either drop the subject of USCF, or get blocked from editing. The comments above explain the issue fully. Guy (Help!) 00:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)