Usernamesarekewl

Dude...

Would you mind not vandalising the Sonic template? You've erased numerous games, and moved other around. It's very annoying. Thank you. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 01:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually I'm changing it to the way it should be. Please just give it a chance I've been researching it for months now! Usernamesarekewl (talk) 01:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Your research is incorrect. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 01:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

That's not very nice. :(

I'm sorry but, the world isn't very nice. Anyway, where did you research? Fansites? You removed both Rivals game, Nex-Gen, and put TDB as main series. Why? I don't seem to understand your logics... Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 01:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

NO! I researched the Sonic games using the five rules listed below the template on the template page. Both Rivals games and next-gen don't refer to any earlier or later games, and TDB does!

Ugh...Please ignore that. It was created by an incorrect user. Please get some sources to back you claims. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 01:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Just give it a chance. PLEASE. We're all God's children here!

I'll give it a chance when you prove your facts. If you persist in this vandalastion, I'll get an admin to block you. I don't want to hve to do so. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 01:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok. STH06 does not make any references to other Sonic games, it even contradicts them. Same with Rivals 1 and 2. SC:TDB makes MANY references to the other Sonic games, it even ties up old plot holes. :)

Yes, Nex-Gen does. Besides, they dn't need to comment each other to be main-series. -.- And vice-versa. Just because TDB references other games, doesn't mean it's main-series. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 01:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if this seems rude, but where is YOUR information coming from? I'm been researching this for a while now by playing each game and I'm pretty sure my info is backed up very well.

By playing the games, and listening to the people who make the games. Yours are what, fansites, and playing halfway through each game? Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 01:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

No! Mine is from playing the games completely and NOTHING from fansites! :(

Then, you're misunderstanding the games... *facepalm* Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 01:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

See this is why these articles need to be deleted! Playing the games is hardly a reliable source now is it? If you can't provide proper sources, books, magazines, newspaper articles, etc then how will it ever be settles. Also S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R please note that editing does not equal vandalising. Please keep it civil. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 17:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. I was getting annoyed at him for removing stuff. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 17:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I actually do have reliable sources for most of it. It would take a while to put down all of it though. I'll have it ready in a few hours then. ^_^ Usernamesarekewl (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

This should be interesting... -.- Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 17:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Dude, would you please consider being NICE for once? No offense but you are being kinda rude to me. :( Usernamesarekewl (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

No offence, but, you have been rather ignorant in your edits. Insisting that you're knowledge of playing the games is correct, and our proof from reliable sources are incorrect. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 17:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Starating a post with "No offence" doesn't mean it will not cause offense. Was there any need need for that comment or the "this should be interesting" one? Theresa Knott | The otter sank 18:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

No, but, there was also no need for him to remove games from the template, and reorganise others. It's very stressful to me. Especially, since, I've repeatedly told him to stop. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 18:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)