UserXPD
for me
June 2021 edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Special administrative region, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HypVol (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Battle of Chamdo edit
Please adhere to WP:NPOV as the word "battle" is more neutral than "invasion" which is the name used by the government-in-exile.--HypVol (talk) 23:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
The word invasion indicates that Tibet was a sovereign state prior to the battle, which is highly controversial. The fact that the corresponding article's name uses the word battle instead of invasion shows that the word battle is preferred and neutral.--HypVol (talk) 23:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
You are distracting my points. I'm talking abt invasion, a military and legal term that is well defined in international law.--HypVol (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
see the UN definition for invasion--HypVol (talk) 00:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
In case you don't understand, this is the Chinese version. --HypVol (talk) 00:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)