February 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm UserDe. Your recent edit to the page Battle of Cam Duong ‎ appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Den-Drater 06:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Cam Duong ‎. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Den-Drater 06:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Cam Duong. Den-Drater 07:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

 

Your recent editing history at Sino-Vietnamese War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chibanano (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply