UnitarianPastor, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi UnitarianPastor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lauren Drain

edit
 

The article Lauren Drain has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Evaders99 (talk) 01:55, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Amy Goodman. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:57, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Candace Gingrich-Jones. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at David Letterman ‎. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD (talk) 13:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Favonian (talk) 15:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lauren Drain

edit
 

The article Lauren Drain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY. Book only published this month, and doesn't seem to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply