Disclosure policy edit

Hi there! Just wanted to let you know it is Wikipedia policy that you *must* disclose on your user page if you are being paid to edit or contribute to Wikipedia (per WP:PAID). Best of luck with your editing journey! ForsythiaJo (talk) 02:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unique Finance (June 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by InterstellarGamer12321 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 06:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, UniqueFinanz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 06:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Unique Finance has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Unique Finance. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 06:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello dear coach,
I am one of the shareholders of this company. It even has a Dubai agency that I put in the photo of Unique Portfolio Management.
I have been a shareholder of this company for more than 4 years. And all the information and references I gave are completely reliable, even the Google Drive links are from my account. Please confirm this article. Our company hides itself and many people are using it to say that this company is fake and Ponzi. that the shareholders think that they have lost their money and cause the shareholder to complain to the other shareholder.
Please help all shareholders of more than 300,000 people around the world to know that Unique Finance is legitimate
I repeat again, this article is not advertising at all, just reliable information that has been removed from public view. My references are from government bodies (Switzerland, England and America Delaware) iosco, NBC news website, world journals.
If it needs to be edited, tell me which item to correct.
Thanks and regards UniqueFinanz (talk) 12:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Secretlondon (talk) 08:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear coach,
I didn’t want add any promotion or anything advertising for the company.
I just wanted to prove that Unique Finance is a Swiss company, legal and real.
I promise that all the photos and texts that appear to be promotions are old and belong to 2 years or more. Currently, there is no promotion or advertising.
And I want the company to understand and fulfill its obligations to all shareholders and not to hide, if it does not want to pay, the shareholders should ask the company for their demands, not the individual.
If you think that my content is promotional or that the picture of issued MasterCard is outside the copyright laws, delete it, but the references and company information are completely reliable and sufficient for proof, please don't delete it, don't let the shareholders be fooled by the lies of the abusers.
Leave at least one article related to Unique Finance so that the shareholders know the truth about their company.
thanks and regards UniqueFinanz (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
As already stated, your account name is in violation of Wikipedia's username policy. Accounts are for individuals; they cannot be named after companies, organizations or groups of people. If you wish to appeal your block, then the only way you can do so is by using the {{unblock-spamun}} template - otherwise your unblock request will never be put into the unblock request queue, and never be noticed by Wikipedia administrators.
Wikipedia is not a business directory, so a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company - or its shareholders - wish to say about it, as this is an inherent conflict of interest.
You will not be unblocked if your only reason for editing Wikipedia is to write about this company. If you have no interest in writing about any other topic, then your time on Wikipedia is over; please find an alternative outlet that allows this type of writing. However, if you wish to be an individual contributor and are willing to first edit topics that are unrelated to your conflict of interest, then please state what those topics are in your unblock request. If you are unblocked and build up a good edit history, as well as an understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, then eventually you might be permitted to write about this company. This trust must be earned over time. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 07:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mehdi jdki 98 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here UniqueFinanz (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No. You've already been told no. This is the end of the line, unless you wish to write about entirely different subject areas and properly address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 10:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Drm310 dear,
Please accept my apologies, I have’t read the rules of the website and I did not know that the name of the company should not be written.
I done requested for change it real rename.
my article about a real company and it’s not promotion or ads. I want just wanted to prove that the company is real and legal.
Due to limited resources, I had to use old information from the company's billboard and television promotions.
Otherwise, I will repeat again, my article is only about the company, it does not have any promotion or advertisement at the moment.
All references are reliable and valid, and if you think they are advertisements, delete them.
My ip is known, if my information was fake or lied or to attract investors that so many websites have posted (such as Google programs and reputable blogs), why should I advertise on Wikipedia?
If I acted against the rules, it is because I did not know. Please reconsider.
Thanks UniqueFinanz (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mehdi jdki 98 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My topic is specific, it is about a Swiss company. Why do I want to say something else that I have no background in?
The first warning I got was for limited resources and incomplete content. When I told about more information such as old advertising and promotion of the company. You blocked my account. And in the answer I also told the reason why. you think I am lying.
If only the problem is this, it solved by editing, But the company's product, which is an ATS, cooperation and sponsorship information, if you want to delete these, it will remain like this, you want to delete Apple's product, which is iPhone and Macbook, or the company's cooperation and similar content.
In my opinion, an article about a company should have the history of its activities and statutes, products, goals, etc… of that company.
If your rules say that these are not allowed, then delete them.
If I had known that this was the case, I would never have written an article on the Wikipedia website. UniqueFinanz (talk) 11:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The answer is still no. I am revoking talk page access because you are not listening. PhilKnight (talk) 11:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Unique Finance edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Unique Finance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bobherry Talk My Edits 15:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Talk page access revoked edit

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 PhilKnight (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply