Unbreakify

Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Van Imhoff (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntientNestor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SS Van Imhoff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntientNestor (talk) 08:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Unbreakify! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AntientNestor (talk) 08:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. S. Van Imhoff has been accepted

S. S. Van Imhoff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AntientNestor (talk) 16:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Talking of sources: just as a matter of interest, where did the tale of "captured by the Nazis" come from?--AntientNestor (talk) 21:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

I really don't know. I was pretty tired at the time of creation. I guess i just assumed that because the netherlands were captured it was automatically a nazi ship. Oops! Mistake on my part. Unbreakify (talk) 16:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Not a million miles: The Dutch had detained German citizens in the Dutch East Indies because Germany had invaded the Netherlands.--AntientNestor (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

That seems kind of bad. Maybe there should be a 'aftermath' section to the wikipedia page. Unbreakify (talk) 19:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Only the direct, close consequences of the incident: the Wikipedia version of "no mission creep" is here.--AntientNestor (talk) 06:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

I've done just a small new "aftermath" section but in fact the issue turned out to be huge, with mutterings about "war crimes" which didn't go away. Scope for expansion, particularly from an editor with knowledge of Dutch and German.--AntientNestor (talk) 17:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Unbreakify. Thank you for your work on SS Van Imhoff. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello, I'm REDACTED403. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Xbox (console), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -REDACTED403 (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

I believe to think it is a reliable sorce. Insignia is in active development as an Xbox Live softmod. I couldn't find any reliable sources other than the offical website itself. You can help by finding any sources if you think otherwise. Im still new to making edits and articles, so any help is appreciated! Unbreakify (talk) 10:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

I've left you a reply on my talk page. Thanks for your contributions :D -REDACTED403 (talk) 11:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Insignia Logo.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Insignia Logo.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Im currently figuring out the licensing for this image, and it'll be changed later if anyone is confused. Unbreakify (talk) 11:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of MV Algoma Enterprise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MV Algoma Enterprise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MV Algoma Enterprise until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)