Welcome!

edit

Hi Uk5056547! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Shadow4dark (talk) 14:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Shadow4dark. I noticed that you recently removed content from Turkish War of Independence without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shadow4dark (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sino-French War without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 14:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at French expedition to Korea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 14:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Algerian War, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at French expedition to Korea. M.Bitton (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Battle of Lundy's Lane shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. M.Bitton (talk) 18:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Uk5056547 reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: ). Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 21:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Partial block from Battle of Lundy's Lane

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of one week for violating the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 21:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Paknam incident

edit

Regarding this edit: Why did you change the numbers? M.Bitton (talk) 20:48, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

No new sources, no new numbers

edit

I have blocked this account sitewide for 2 weeks for disruption. Please don't add unsourced content, and definitely don't edit war over such additions. El_C 20:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Détachement Français de Palestine et de Syrie moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Détachement Français de Palestine et de Syrie, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 13:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice of sockpuppetry block

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Derbyboy2890 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Uk5056547. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 20:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply