UW Bothell

July 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to University of Washington Bothell— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:09, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violation etc

It appears you have added a lot of text lifted straight from UW Bothell's own website to University of Washington Bothell. Doing this is unsuitable for Wikipedia in several ways: it introduces an inappropriately promotional and praiseful tone into the article, and it violates copyright. (Thanks for removing the material, User:Oshwah). Your username suggests you're affiliated with UW Bothell. Are you? Whether or not, we don't allow names of institutions as usernames here; all users need to be recognizably individuals, not collectives. Bishonen | talk 22:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC).

July 2015

Your addition to University of Washington Bothell has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your edit used content taken straight off this site. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Stop now

Your edit at User talk:Oshwah shows that you do represent the university, rather than yourself as an individual. Please stop now, and respond to my civil inquiry above, instead of continuing to restore the material, or I will block you from editing. Bishonen | talk 22:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC).

Blocked

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, UW Bothell, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. 

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Yes, your username is the only reason for your block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see above), and you are then welcome to continue editing in accordance with Wikipedia standards. Despite what the template above may suggest, you are not welcome to continue your previous editing patterns.

You may not add material to Wikipedia articles that is derived from other web pages, unless this material meets all three of the following criteria:

1. it is explicitly in the public domain (which is extremely unlikely) or explicitly released by the CC BY-SA 3.0 License or the GFDL (which is unlikely);
2. it is from a disinterested source;
3. it is factual and nonpromotional.

(NB "the public domain" means something like "subject to no copyright claim"; it does not mean "public knowledge", "without technical barriers against copying", or similar.)

Wikipedia is not a public relations conduit, even when the PR is for an institution that operates for the public good. -- Hoary (talk) 23:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)