USFac
Image tagging for Image:157.pdf
editThanks for uploading Image:157.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:157.pdf)
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:157.pdf. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Kentucky Fried Cruelty
edit
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. P4k (talk) 22:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
December 2007
editBurger King
edit
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Burger King. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. When contributing to an article, please remember to follow the guidelines set forth in the neutrality policy and citing sources guidelines. Your recent additions to this article are of merit but were presented in such a way to imply bias on your part as a contributor. Additionally you failed to provide citations of reliable secondary sources to verify your points. If you wish to learn more about properly citing your contributions, please see the Wikipedia:Citing sources article.
-Jeremy (Jerem43 (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC))
Dole Food Company
edit Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Dole Food Company, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please note that by failing to abide by the guidelines of the neutrality policy and failing to properly cite your contributions, you are in danger of having your account blocked for "POV pushing." If you would like to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, please review the guidelines set forth in the manual of style and its related policy guidelines.
- Jeremy (Jerem43 (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC))
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Talk:Dole Food Company . Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ talk 19:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Monsanto
edit Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Monsanto. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. While reviewing your recent contributions in regards to the recent warnings, I noticed that you have posted to several articles, including the Monsanto article, without providing proper or failing to provide complete citations. This situation needs to be addressed if you wish to remain a positive contributor to Wikipedia. Again please take the time to read the aforementioned guidelines about sourcing your contributions.
- Jeremy (Jerem43 (talk) 18:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC))
Pfizer
edit
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Pfizer, you will be blocked from editing. Please learn to properly cite your additions. You provided citations to this article and failed to link them so readers can understand what they refer to and what section they are citing. While it is understood that you are trying to be bold in your contributions, to continue to so with out following the guidelines of Wikipedia is causing serious disruptions. Please stop and take the time to follow up on your wikiskills
- Jeremy (Jerem43 (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC))
Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
edit This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Federal Prison Industries, Inc., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ talk 23:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Notes on the warnings
edit- This account is a teaching tool for a group who needs to create a user page stating as much;
- The warnings posted here are only that, at this time. If the contributors utilizing this account continue to follow the course they are on they will find themselves blocked, not necessarily by me but by an administrator.
- Please review the policy links that are listed in the various warnings as they demonstrate the proper guidelines for using Wikipedia.
Thank you for voicing your concerns by posting to my user page, but please take the time to learn the rules of the community before continuing this course. I am not the only contributor who posted to your talk page and I am not the only contributor with whom you dealt. Other contributors may ask for a block on this account if the rules are not followed.
- Jeremy (Jerem43 (talk) 02:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC))
Image copyright problem with Image:Organic Dairy Industry.pdf
edit Thank you for uploading Image:Organic Dairy Industry.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Royal Caribbean International. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -MBK004 22:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
