UKIPteen

That's the worst possible article for you to be editing

Hello UKIPteen. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article UK Independence Party, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to UK Independence Party. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at UK Independence Party, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UK Independence Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at UK Independence Party, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 14:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --RJFF (talk) 15:52, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at UK Independence Party. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UKIPteen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was only trying to change my user name, and I thought there was no way to change it, but to be banned from editing giving me a choice of a new user name.

Decline reason:

I'm fairly sure you knew blanking an article was not the best way to go about changing your username. — Joseph Fox 16:05, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UKIPteen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Then what is the other way of changing my user name? I would like to ask you what do you get out blanking a page? Exept for the posibillity of changing my user name.

Decline reason:

Firstly, nothing you did had any connection whatever with changing your username, and it is totally implausible that you thought it did. Secondly, your editing has been disruptive, and you have made no serious attempt to address that fact. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UKIPteen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It did have a connection, because last time I got blocked I was given the choice to change my user name.

Decline reason:

This request, like the previous ones, is complete nonsense. If your next request is more nonsense you will probably find your ability to appeal in this manner revoked. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is no plausible connection between "please change my username" and massive vandalism of an encyclopedia article. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Let me just see if I've got this straight:

• You used to be Ukipyouth (talk · contribs). That account was blocked for pushing an agenda and having an unacceptable username.
• When you were blocked you received a notice that said, in part: "Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead."

• You created a new account with a similarly problematic username and went straight back to editing in the same manner
• And then...what? You decided you wanted to change your name again so you deliberately got blocked for vandalism? Is that it? Beeblebrox (talk) 18:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UKIPteen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You know very well why I did it. Wikipedia is just an orginazation of Left Wingers, who don't want a taste of some Moderate Right Wing Politics.

Decline reason:

As it is very clear you intend to continue your disruptive behaviour, I have blocked you from editing this page as well. —An  optimist on the run! 19:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.