Turtleturtle00

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Rodgers (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Rodgers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeff Rodgers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 11:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Turtleturtle00! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 11:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jeff Rodgers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeff Rodgers. Thanks! JC7V-talk 19:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Rodgers (November 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

K.e.coffman (talk) 23:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Turtleturtle00. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Jeff Rodgers, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jeff Rodgers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jeff Rodgers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from Confidence Compare https://www.azcardinals.com/team/coaches-roster/jeff-rodgers. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheMesquito^buzz 02:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Reply

Hello! Just checking in. Gregg Williams already exists. Is that who you had in mind? Red Director (talk) 20:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

I see. Looks good to me. Relevant person in a relevant position. You have references, links, and a infobox. We can monitor it and see what others think. Red Director (talk) 21:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Looks like that was a while back. It seems the coach in questions has landed at some notable jobs. You cannot undo a deletion nomination for archive purposes. Let's see what happens with the admins that look at it. Red Director (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

• Hello, I deleted Greg Williams (American football coach) as an exact copy of the version that was deleted last year (discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Williams (American football coach)). If you have a hidden cache of sources that would show the topic to have significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources (?), I suggest writing a draft at Draft:Greg Williams (American football coach) and submitting it for review. But unless you have many additional sources, the article is unlikely to be restored. (not watching, please {{ping}} as needed) czar 23:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

The article you just deleted has been updated to reflect that Greg Williams is notable due to his playing career as well as his extensive coaching career. There are many articles (that are less in depth than this) for other coaches throughout the NFL, who have far less experience. Please consider allowing this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turtleturtle00 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Moved from User talk:Czar § Greg Williams (American football coach)

@Turtleturtle00, we judge each article's sourcing on its own merits and by participant consensus. I started a discussion on the article's talk page, but otherwise we ask that content deleted by consensus not be recreated without the introduction of new sourcing/evidence worthy of reopening that discussion. I've already suggested to create a draft but you've recreated the article with identical content. Please discuss on the article's talk page: Talk:Greg Williams (American football coach). To your point, yes, other articles may exist with less sourcing but we can only discuss one article at a time and haven't found those yet. czar 06:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

One of the reasons for deletion (by Johnpacklambert) was due to the fact that previously the article did not reflect his playing career; the article is now in fact updated to show his playing career as well as his extensive coaching career, thus making it a notable admission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turtleturtle00 (talk • contribs) 06:53, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Usually articles require more evidence of significant coverage than the sources currently provide BUT I notified the discussants from the last discussion so we'll see what they say. czar 14:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

There is a response on Talk:Greg Williams (American football coach) that you can engage there. (not watching, please {{ping}} as needed) czar 16:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Your addition to Kliff Kingsbury has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Charlie Bullen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charlie Bullen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CatcherStorm ^talk 02:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Bullen (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Bullen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charlie Bullen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 03:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Greg Williams

Hello, Turtleturtle00. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Greg Williams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Charlie Bullen

Hello, Turtleturtle00. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charlie Bullen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Derrick LeBlanc (2nd nomination) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derrick LeBlanc (2nd nomination) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derrick LeBlanc (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

• Hi there. I have nominated this page for deletion as I do not believe it warrants inclusion under Wikipedia's notability guidelines. You can see my reasioning in the deletion discussion listed above. If you have any questions, simply reply to this message and begin your response with {{Re|Wibbit23}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thank you! Wibbit23 (talk) 03:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

@Wibbit23: Derrick LeBlanc is an NFL coach, most of whom have Wikipedia profiles, especially the one's who have coached as many years as he has. The NFL is a multi-billion dollar business and the most popular sports league in the world. Thanks! TurtleTurtle00 Turtleturtle00 (talk) 04:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

@TurtleTurtle00: Hello! I appreciate your input, and encourage you to add your comments to the AfD discussion listed above. You will also be able to see more in detail, my exact explanation on why I do not believe this article warrants inclusion.

While your points on the popularity of the NFL and coaches are valid, Wikipedia does have specific guidelines for inclusion into the namespace. One such criteria is WP:GNG which states that subjects of articles must have significant, non-trivial, independent, secondary coverage. As required by AfD, I preformed a google search on the subject, and returned sources that are not able to establish notability. Blogs, fan pages, and team/NFL pages are not able to establish notability.

I hoppe this helps, but if you have any further questions feel free to respond here! Thanks! Wibbit23 (talk) 04:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)