Tufayl Ahmad, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Tufayl Ahmad! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018 edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Leh. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 21:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Tufayl Ahmad, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Leh district, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kargil district, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2019 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dogra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

ARBIPA sanctions alert edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2019 edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Leh has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

POV Edits with misleading edit summary that says "Fixed grammar" edit

Please stop your POV Edits with misleading edit summary that says "Grammar fixes". you edits have already been reverted. This topic area is covered by WP:ARBIPA and continuing such behavior will lead to block or topic bans from editing such articles. --DBigXray 09:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Tafayl: I'll second DBigXray's message. In fact, almost all your edits qualify as "POV Edits with misleading edit summary" (additional examples: [1], [2], [3]). This needs to stop or else you will be blocked. Please read wikipedia's policies on sourcing and neutral POV, and use honest and appropriate edit-summaries. Abecedare (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm CAPTAIN MEDUSA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mohammad Tawhidi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 17:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for blatant BLP violations (example) and continuing to make POV edits with deceptive edit summaries despite multiple recent warnings on exactly that topic.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply