December 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that in this edit to Royal Rumble (2019), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flooded with them hundreds 07:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Fastlane (2019), you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Elimination Chamber (2019), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 20:52, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Elimination Chamber (2019). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 20:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at WrestleMania 35. StaticVapor message me! 19:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at WrestleMania XXVI. TheDeviantPro (talk) 11:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User:WWESpiderman. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

This user destroy the tlc 2019 page TSN (talk) 05:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you think so, discuss with them in the talkpage. Personal attacks are never good. Hope you understand. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Genre edits

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content and removing/adding genres without a proper explanation. I have recently reverted your edits. You did not pay attention to the sources/references used to cite genres, and had inserted random genres to a few pages. Even if they were right, WP:FILMLEAD clearly states the lead sentence should not be stuffed with genres. Please keep this in mind and you're welcome to make useful contributions to Wikipedia. (77Survivor (talk) 10:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC))Reply

Thank you for sending me message TSN (talk) 11:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bachelor Point, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Series. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, most recently here where you seem to think that adding your personal opinion was appropriate.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply