Jimmy Dee edit

Whilst authors of articles can blank them and request deletion I think that the article has been around for long enough that a number of other people have contributed to it. If you still want to delete it I suggest you WP:PROD it and let the other contributors know so that they can stop it if they wish. Please do not blank the article again as this may be treated as vandalism. Regards, Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 18:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why are you removing the content about Jimmy Dee from the article? Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 18:35, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jimmy Dee edit

 

The article Jimmy Dee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Author requests deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 18:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

July 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jimmy Dee, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Edinburgh Wanderer 18:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jimmy Dee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Since you didn't tell me why you are removing the content I reverted your edit. If there a reason that you are removing the content?
Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 18:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply