User talk:Trusilver/archive5

YARRR

		Happy International Talk Like a Pirate Day!
		Ahoy! How 'bout a jug o' grog, me hearty? Regarrrrds, GlassCobra 17:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Back, sort of

My broadband card for my laptop and my router at home both died on the same day. I took that as a sign that I had been spending way too much time with Wikipedia. Between my adminship bid and Cirque du Soleil, I was going non-stop for almost a month. I took a few weeks off and got both my router and my broadband card fixed and I will be back after this weekend. I hope everyone is doing well. Trusilver 03:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back . . . sort of.  :) Good luck with everything. Into The Fray ^T/C 04:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Likewise, welcome back ;) not that I can really welcome you, as I've been away as well :\ anyway, hope you've become accustomed to the Admin. tools! Happy Editing :) Anthøny ん 16:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome Back

Hi, Trusilver!! Nice to see you back. If you have some time, please have a look at the Biman Bangladesh Airlines. Some people have done a good job with it. I think it would interest you a bit. By the way, don't look for my name in the history section (haven't done a single edit for it :( Good luck, hope you'd fly Biman (means airplane) home. Let me have a nap at the passenger seat ;) Regards as always --Tarif from Bangladesh 16:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. Regarrrrds mate! --Tarif from Bangladesh 16:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Trusilver ;) Hope you're doing great! If you have some time today, please have a look at the Kazi Salahuddin article for some copy editing. I'm going for a DYK entry and it's the last day :( Regards--Tarif from Bangladesh 06:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Mistake?

I corrected your edit here since there wasn't any deletion requests there I assumed you made a mistake and placed the wrong tag.. it seems to be an obvious vandalism on a user page. --F3rn4nd0 ^{(Roger - Out)} 04:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-08-22 Computer program

Hi Trusilver. You took in this mediation cabal case a while ago, but we've not really heard anything since. This is just a polite reminder - I know you are often away so I understand if it will take a while. Alternatively, feel free to un-assign yourself if you don't think you're likely to have time to deal with this. Thanks for your input. --HappyDog 20:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Copyedit request for FAC

Hi there. I was wondering if you could take the time to copyedit Lethbridge. It is a FAC and most of the complaints now are regarding copyediting. I've doen the best I can, but I've been staring at this article for so long, my head is spinning. Thank you very much for your consideration. :) --Kmsiever 16:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Zeitgeist (video)

• A draft userspace article has been created. Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 8. Pdelongchamp 21:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality Project

Hi, I'm trying to ensure that the Neutrality Project has not become inactive. If you would still like to participate in it, please re-add your name to the Review Team list. _Jame§^ugrono 08:03, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Copy edit request

Hello, Trusilver,

I recently requested a copy edit from the League of Copy Editors and noticed that your name is included on the list of participants. At this writing, Jimmy McAleer, a B-class biography of an old-time American baseball figure, is in the peer review process. So far, all reviewers have suggested that the article is ready to send to the GAC. A couple of them recommended that I send it straight to the FAC. Before considering the latter, I would like to ensure that the article is as clean as possible. I'd greatly appreciate any time you're able to devote to it. Cheers, -- twelsht (talk) 14:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

শুভ বড়দিন -->Shuvho Baurodin-->Merry Christmas --Tarif from Bangladesh (talk) 06:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

It's going alright, friend! I was inactive in Wikipedia as well. I'll try to come back again. Regards and Happy New Year ;D --Tarif from Bangladesh (talk) 17:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call

Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors.

Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Incorrect Vandalism 'Warning'.

Dear 'Trusilver'...

Re: Edits made on 'Charades' on the 15th of June, I have received a pretty angry message from you claiming that I vandalised the page. I am afraid to say that you've got your facts wrong. I did not edit the page, nor did anyone from my IP Address. On the date specified, I was sans internet connection, so it was impossible. Oops. That's not to say someone didn't vandalise it, as they certainly did, but it wasn't me or anyone in my immediate vicinity. Maybe the IP Address changed. I think you sent the message when that happened, but it has only cropped up now. So in future, I think you should double-check what you are claiming prior to wasting your's and someone else's time by making a false accusation.

There is no need to reply, I have made my point and understand yours already. Let's sweep it all under the carpet now and start afresh.

Arigato gozaimasu, thanks, and merci beaucoup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by This is yesterday (talk • contribs) 20:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Without any other information, I'm assuming that you speak of this edit in particular [1]. This edit most definitely was vandalism although it is indeed possible it was done by someone else who happened to be using your IP - a very good reason to create an account which I see that you have done. Considering the fact that this was the only edit made by this IP, I'm figuring that it was a dynamic address which both you and the offending user happened to share. I suggest you take your own advice from above. Trusilver (talk) 22:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Hoo-rah. I know exactly how everything functions - thanks - and in addition, I was not making a false accusation (whereas you did) and therefore my own advice is not relevant to me. I was, for the most part, just dying to prove my innocence in this matter. Which I have done. So there we go. TIY (talk) 14:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

You obviously do not know how things function since you were unable to determine for yourself when the vandalism warning was sent to you. (hint: It's right here and it's dated June 16th, 2007.) There was vandalism associated with your IP address as you will see from the link above, and you are incorrect when you say the vandalism warning was just sent - it was sent six months ago. The fact that it happened was irrefutable...again, see the link above, everything is dated. Whether you did it or not is between you and whoever else shares that IP, but seeing that you have an account, I really don't see what your particular problem is. Nobody has accused you of vandalism, the accusation was made toward the IP address in general - which as we all know doesn't neccessarily point to a particular person. Good day. Trusilver (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar

Thanks, I really do appreciate it. Happy‑melon 22:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem and thank you again. I'm always stressing about what's going on with the LoCE when I'm not around to help out, I'm glad that there are people stepping up and taking charge - it really puts my mind at ease. Trusilver (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome Back

Glad to see you editing again. Acroterion _(talk) 04:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, work has slowed way down for me which has given me the time I need to jump back onboard, which is good because I have an article that has been sitting half-finished for months now :). Good to see that everyone is pretty much right where I left them. Trusilver (talk) 04:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

I did not vandalize anything with this IP!!! What's going on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.153.225.77 (talk) 04:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Then I'm assuming that this edit that you made[2] must come as an enormous shock to you. Trusilver (talk) 04:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

For the revert to my user page.  :-) delldot talk 05:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. It's always fun when the vandals get vindictive. Trusilver (talk) 05:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Waves!

Woohoo!!! My signature works! see -----> DesertAngel 05:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Mine does too, and it's not distracting. see------> Trusilver (talk) 05:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Corrections

Please review the history of Blotto adrift. He has been changing the trenton ontario page as well as several other pages on an hourly bases - more than 3 times a day. There are numbours errors on the trenton ontario page as stated in the history but Blotto adrift keeps changing the page back to HIS edits. I am only trying to help by correcting mistakes.

please look into all of Blotto adrift actions and please read what other users have said.

Thank you.

I already have and the only changes I have seen that you are making is one that changes the wikilink to redirect to the incorrect page and another which changes "notable" people (correct) to"Famous" people (incorrect). I'm going to keep a watch over the page and if it becomes necessary, I will put it under protection. Trusilver (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Too quick and too trusting

72.155.193.91 self reverted. I don't see a reason to block. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 22:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Rewarding a vandal for self-reverting their vandalism AFTER they get caught for it is like saying it's okay to steal a car just as long as you put it back where you found it when you are done. I will unblock contingent on no more vandalism, the next offense and the block goes back. Trusilver (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The latest warning on his userpage was actually for another person's edit. The "vandalism" is hours old. Blocks are not punitive. I'm not trying to reward anyone only undo a clear mistake. You didn't look at the history properly before blocking :- ( Theresa Knott | The otter sank 22:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. All the past history on this user were performed by editors, one of them an admin, who I have never known to make questionable WP:AIV reports before. Thanks for pointing it out to me. Trusilver (talk) 22:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

No harm done. Thanks for undoing the block so promptly. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 22:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, have a good evening. ;) Trusilver (talk) 22:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Heya

Lovely to have you back around! Hope the start of the year is treating you well :) ~ Riana ⁂ 04:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey there Riana, glad to see you back from your trip, I hope everything went well. And yes, so far the year is treating me pretty good - though I think that ten days is too small of a representative sample to make a judgment on the year as a whole quite yet. Trusilver (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Comments

Sorry, I cannot take the risk with your comments -

Notice of request for deletion of editor Trusilver :)

Trusilver, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion#Trusilver and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :).

I think we might have a problem.

This person keeps making pages like this which seem to be spam. there are a bunch, check his contribs. Thanks, Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 19:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Smile

NHRHS2010 (talk · contribs) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

NHRHS2010 talk 20:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

North Salem wasn't Jeru-salem.

Hey, thanks for that barnstar! I really appreciate it. Doczilla (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

All in a good day's work of ensuring no propaganda is spread about Jesus living in New York City. Trusilver (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandal block

The block template you just put on User talk:99.141.134.113 says "indefinitely" I think you wanted to say 31 hours per [3] Jeepday (talk) 05:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for catching that. Trusilver (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for fixing the vandalism on my user page a bit ago. Guldenat (talk) 07:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem :) Trusilver (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

He called me a racist and refused to apologize!

I don't take that from anybody. If you call me a racist you are going to get personally attacked. Don't leave bogus warnings on my talk page please. Lobojo (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't care what he did, WP:CIVIL is a two-way street. The second you start calling someone else names, you have nullified your right to complain. The warning stands. Trusilver (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not complaining. When did I complain? I'm so childish as to go crying when somebody calls me names. But I am perfectly entitled to respond when someone calls me a racist and refuses to apologize. Lobojo (talk) 21:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which I withdrew with 5 support, 14 oppose, and 9 neutral. Thank you for your comments! Whether it was a support, oppose, or neutral, I likely got some good feedback from you. I will probably do another RfA in the future, but not until I work out the issues brought up.

Soxπed Ninety Three | tcdb 17:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

The Cabal that has it all!

This user is a member of
The Bathrobe Cabal.

You have email, about email. Ironic, isn't it? the_undertow ^talk 02:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Not as ironic as being a member of a group whose trademark is an article of clothing that I had never worn before yesterday. Trusilver (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not about the clothes, it's about the purging. Purging! Comfort! - TRANSMISSION ENDS - Dfrg_msc 04:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Power to the people!....oh wait, that's for the wrong protest. Trusilver (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Please accept your honorary Bathrobe Cabal Slippers..... Of Doom!

Welcome, yo. Lara❤Love 19:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you...

...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.

In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.

By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.

Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.

This RfA thanks inspired by Kathryn McDinaha's, in turn inspired by several others after Phaedriels' original. Hoping we can all keep such inspiration of newcomers ongoing, I am, sincerely, John Carter (talk).

John Carter (talk) 21:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Whoa

[4] I was actually watching Pulp Fiction when I read that comment... <goes to look for camera in room>. Jmlk17 06:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Don't bother, I've hidden it far too well :) Trusilver (talk) 06:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Rudget!

Dear Trusilver, my sincere thanks for your support in my second request for adminship, which ended with 113 supports, 11 opposes, and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank my admin coach and nominator, Rlevse and Ryan Postlethwaite who in addition to Ioeth all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to Phoenix-wiki, Dihyrdogen Monoxide and OhanaUnited who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that the community really does have something other places don't. Who would have though Gmail would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond, Rudget. 16:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 08:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

One more for you - repsponce

You are one of the most phenomenally fast vandalism whackers I've ever seen. Thank you for keeping me so busy at WP:AIV. Trusilver (talk) 17:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |}

• (Blushes) Thanks a lot for the star and the compliment. I would rather not keep you so busy (That would mean there is no vandalism in the first place), but as long as that situation can still be considered utopian, ill just have fun playing whack-a-vandal :-) --Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 17:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Vulva Edit

I think you were wrong to revert my edit :(. This has always happened in my experience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.118.138 (talk) 21:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Very humorous, don't do it again. Trusilver (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I was not attempting humour as I was not programmed to do so. My good faith edit has been molested by you! 86.149.118.138 (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:209.169.27.217

I was just looking over the contributions then, I agree. I'll undo the block now, and re-instate a level 4 message, per the concerns that it may be dynamic. Thanks. Regards, Rudget. 21:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. and by the way, good job and congratulations on your RfA. Trusilver (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

 Done - and thanks. I respect your opinion because you've had way more experience, and you know what you're talking about. If you have any other problems with blocks that I impose, always ask me for the reasons etc. Regards, Rudget. 21:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The circus is in town

Removal of Warnings

Can you remove those warnings? Are you an Admin? Jdchamp31 (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

You are free to remove the warnings made to your talk page. However, I suggest that you resolve whatever issues you are having with the other user. The correct way to do that is NOT to make frivolous complaints to WP:AIV or WP:3RR, all that does is makes the administrators monitoring those boards irritable. Trusilver (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I'm getting depressed virtually every time I hit Wikipedia and see the New Messages notice. I know I'm far from perfect as an editor, but I'm really not understanding what's going on vis-a-vis Jdchamp31. Thank you for intervening, --Squiggleslash (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Absurd

There is no need for the stuff he is saying. He is not getting depressed he is wrong and other users should know he violates 3RR. I will continue to post the warnings and will kepp requesting AIV.

Threatening to Block

I do not think it is fair that you threaten to block me when you are not doing anything to help and resolve the situation. I will seek intervention as this is an issue that needs to be tended to. It is a dispute between edits on a template and edits between two users that both contribute on Wikipedia. Jdchamp31 (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Continued threats and you still cease to help me. It seems to be that you are harassing me and not helping me. Jdchamp31 (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Just because you say it doesn't make it so. You don't need anyone to help you, you need to help yourself by actually talking about your disagreement with this editor rather than by making frivolous warning and false reports. Trusilver (talk) 01:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

now I know

Thanks for the DYK! 31 seemed like an odd number Archtransit (talk) 00:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

User:68.45.132.38

Thank you for the 31 hour block on User:68.45.132.38. But I'm confused, if you look back at his user contribution history, he is clearly an anon IP sock of indefinitely blocked User:Editorhwaller. I'm confused as to how this anon IP evaded the indefinite block and is there any way for me to request adding this anon IP to the list of Editorhwaller socks? Thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely, see if you can find the puppeteer account at WP:SSP and add the new suspected IP to the list. It's very likely that the IP address that he is now editing from is different from the one his primary account was blocked from, and thus he's not going to be stopped by the block on that IP. Trusilver (talk) 01:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Trusilver. I just tried that for for some reason, following the instructions as best I can (they are rather confusing to me) it stuck my report at the bottom in Archives rather than the Open cases section of WP:SSP. Do you think that's a problem? Will some kind admin spot it down there? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I cut and pasted it into Open Cases and at least it's visible now. Thanks again. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I just to really looking into this editor and realized he has already been identified as a chronic sockpuppeteer. Any suspected IP's get automatically added to the list when the "suspected sock" template is added to the user page. You can find the list here.[5] Trusilver (talk) 01:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

John Forbes (actor)

Quick question: I noticed you declined this on the grounds that it didn't meet G1. For my own curiosity, which criteria would be more appropriate? The entirety of the article is completely made up; the guy doesn't even exist (see my note on the talk page). Thanks for your help! Gromlakh (talk) 07:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I've spent the last fifteen minutes or so researching this and I fully agree that it is a hoax. However, hoax articles are best to send to AfD and give the community a few days to fully explore the article and make sure that it has been fully verified that there is no truth to it. Go ahead and AfD it, I will be the first to support the deletion. Trusilver (talk) 07:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

The article's author is now trolling around on the AfD page inventing non-existent users to support his position. Classic. Gromlakh (talk) 15:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

your email

Hello Trusilver. Thanks for your mail. Unfortunately I won't be able to answer it because of some problems with my email-programme. If you would have the time, we could talk in the IRC. You could come there by this site, my nick is "aitias" there. Best wishes from —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm there nearly every day, but I'm usually only in #wikipedia-en-admins. I will keep an eye out to see if you are online when I'm there tonight. Trusilver 16:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I can't join #wikipedia-en-admins. :( So I can't see, wether you are there... —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

It's okay. I've added you to my friends list, I will see you when you are on IRC. Trusilver 01:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed unsuccessfully with 25 support, 18 oppose, and 6 neutral. Thanks for stating your rationales why I should not be granted this time and I'll try my best to deal with it. I'll look forward working with you. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 07:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

thx

I have the mop but can you search the RFA meeting shown to find the bucket?	<font=3> Thanks for your support, my request for adminship passed 60/0/0 yesterday! I want to thank Mrs.EasterBunny and Royalbroil for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. To paraphrase a president ... I wish my mum and dad could see the comments made. My dad would be so proud to see the comments ... and my mum would have believed them". I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and you may be surprised to find that I have not deleted all of the pages by accident..... yet). Thanks again, Victuallers (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)	An early RFA meeting to decide if Victuallers can be included as a sysop - use cursor to identify.

Glacier dropsy

Congrats on your adminship! I flagged this page Glacier dropsy because it's a fictional illness based on a TV show. Do you think it qualifies for speedy? Would appreciate advice. Thanks, --laurap414 (talk) 21:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank-spam

Trusilver/archive5, I wish to tender my sincere thanks for your support in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 37 supports, 2 opposes, and 2 neutral. The results of the RfA are extremely bittersweet because of the recent departure of my nominator, Rudget. Hopefully I can live up to his and your expectations. I would especially like to thank Epbr123 and TomStar81 for mentioning that they were preparing to offer me a nomination. The past week has been one of the most stressful weeks in my life, and I appreciate your vote of confidence in me. If you ever need anything, just get in touch. -MBK₀₀₄ 21:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Marvelously calm and objective response to unblock request

I was really impressed by your response to an unblock request. (The diff looks confusing; the part you actually added begins with "|decline=".) Given the tone of the request you were replying to, I find the wording of your response to be a model of detachment, diplomacy and objectivity. --Coppertwig (talk) 01:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I really appreciate that. :) Trusilver 04:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Are you crazy?

Are you crazy? You deleted the article, which was about one of the biggest factions of the largest Italian political party, without even waiting for me to hangon. As I understand that you did a mistake in good faith, I ask you kindly to revert your edit as it was simply undefendable. Thank you! --Checco (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Let's see... one of the biggest factions of the largest Italian political parties which was launched, according to your article.... today. No, I support the nomination for CSD. If you can show me some references that pass WP:N, I will either reinstated it or send it to AfD and let consensus decide. Trusilver 20:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

All the Italian newspapers wrote about it in their websites today (see Google news) because Veltroni, leader of the Democratic Party, attended the convention. Anyway, as merge of Liberal DS with other groups, I cannot understand how can it be considered not encyclopedic. The faction is composed of a number of MPs, by former ministers (Zanone, Bianco, Bassanini) and other leading politicians (notably Morando, leader of Liberal DS), as this source reckons. They will have soon a website. I don't feel any particular sympathy for them (as you may desume from my userpage), but they are definitely relevant for Wikipedia, as are all other Italian political party factions, on which other users and I are working. If you see my record, you will understand that I write on every Italian political party or faction. --Checco (talk) 20:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The article had a reference. I don't know why you did not read it. Anyway Liberal PD is the translation of "Liberal PD" (Italian not Romanian!) and means the liberal part of PD, acronym for Democratic Party. Please read articles before deleting them! --Checco (talk) 20:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I did read it and your suggestion that I did not is baseless and counterproductive to getting what you want. But as you know... or should know... you need to have multiple non-trivial sources. ESPECIALLY when dealing with current events which tend to be dismissed as non-notable half the time anyway. I'm going to reinstate it on a wait and see basis. Add some references to the article and I will watch the news over the next few days concerning it. If it appears to satisfy notability than that's the end of it. If it doesn't I will AfD it and let consensus decide. Sound good? Trusilver 20:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Very good. Thank you. --Checco (talk) 20:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Done. I will check back on it on Monday or Tuesday both here and in the news. Trusilver 21:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)