User talk:Trudebeck/Archive 1

Welcome!

I hereby assert myself to be the same editor as [1], and therefore eligible to vote in the Picture of the Year awards. Thor Rudebeck 08:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Kaukauna, Wisconsin

I returned the section on transportation. I did feel like it was out of place, for it had a far wider scope than just Kaukauna. I suggest creating a transportation section to the Wisconsin article, and adding it to the section. I'm curious to see how other editors feel about the notability of this edit. Cheers! Royalbroil ^{Talk  Contrib} 13:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I don't really know how this all works, but someone has taken off your sign saying that it is not controversial. I can assure you that it is. This is just a bunch of irresponsible nonsense attacking my team and my people. Thank you. Yours fathfully, Renée, London

Image tagging for Image:Kaukaunasouthsidedowntown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kaukaunasouthsidedowntown.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Wisconsin Highway images

Please note the I usually sort the images that I upload to Wisconsin highways articles by location like I did for Wisconsin Highway 441. Please place them in their proper order next time! Thanks! Royalbroil ^T : C 14:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Hearthstone

I started an article on the Hearthstone Historic House Museum. I plan on having the article featured on the Did You Know section on the homepage. Feel free to enhance the article, but make sure that any contributions are well sourced (as required by the DYK standard). Royalbroil ^T : C 15:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Gay icon

I just read your comments on the talkpage and am a bit confused. Could you clarify them for me? In the first place, the fact that the names are referenced meets WP:V, so I am confident as to the contents. Secondly, I didn't understand a bit of what you meant about future editors. It could be just me--I have an awful cold, and have been editing that damn article for the betetr part of 7 hours today to keep it from deletion. But clarification would be appreciated. Jeffpw 16:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

• I do understand what you mean about the names not looking so pretty, but if memory serves me, this was already deleted as a category once, so I wonder if a list would be any better. If you want to delete some of the entertainment ones, I have no objection, though I do think they all qualify. If you do delete, though, may I ask that you delete Americans and not other natioinalities? I had a {{world)) tag on it earlier, since it was so weighted down with American examples. Also, when you delete, please check to see if you are deleting a ref that is used in more than one area, so that the refs still work. Thanks for your feedback on this. I saw this on the LGBT list as a "targeted article", and spent the better part of the day ensuring it was not deleted. Jeffpw 17:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

re: Fox Cities

Regarding your comments on Template talk:Appleton, Wisconsin, I've responded here. BTW, regarding your comments on your userpage, be of good courage, it's not unusual for Wisconites to be confused for Canadians bcz of ignorance about the fact that what people regard as "Canadian English" is actually just the fact that the majority of Canadian English speakers are linguistic clones of upper-Midwestern American English speakers.  :-) Cheers, Tomer^talk 09:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Grignon home

I notice that you took a picture of the Grignon home. I have an article about the home from this past weekend's Post Crescent. I am looking to write an article on the home soon, and possibly do it as a DYK article. Is it possible to get closer picture, or are there obstacles? I would consider taking a picture myself. Otherwise I might crop down the picture that you took. Please respond here on your talk page. Royalbroil ^T : C 02:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

I took the picture as I did merely to include the little arched gate at the front. I borrowed somebody's camera to take all of those pictures, so getting a new picture might be hard. You could use the picture as is, or take a new one, but cropping it for a new article might be redundant on the Wikimedia server. Whatever you think is best. Thor Rudebeck 15:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ghost.GIF

Hello, Tjrudebeck. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Ghost.GIF) was found at the following location: User:Tjrudebeck/Kaukauna, Wisconsin. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:NU seal.jpg

Hello Tjrudebeck, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:NU seal.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Tjrudebeck/Northwestern University School of Communication. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Appleton, Wisconsin churches

Many thanks for the message. If there are any existing articles about churches, places of worship, etc., in Appleton, I will add them. Is there any weblinks about the various churches, etc. that can be added to the article? What about churches, places of worship, etc. that are historic? Thank you-RFD 14:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

NU Comm School

I recently created a page for the NU comm school, I noticed you have a working page in your namespace. If you'd like, maybe you can move some of your content to the main article at Northwestern University School of Communication - AKeen 16:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Snowclones

← See Talk:List of snowclones for several rationales for keeping the list pruned. Some of the rationales are mine. :) (Re your particular additions: Yes, lolcats and other Fark/SA/whoever Internet memes are responsible for all your base and "killin ur doodz" as well as "Oh hi i upgraded ur RAM", so I wouldn't object if someone else deleted them. "This is X" is about as much a snowclone as "It's X" or "Where's the X?" — it's not (AFAIK) used as a meme by mainstream writers. And even if it were used, in an unambiguous way (e.g. "This is Sbarro's!", as opposed to "This is my life!" or "This is silly") the writer'd be thinking of 300, which makes it parody or a pop-culture reference, not a snowclone.) --Quuxplusone 02:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Tilt-shift miniature faking

I have nominated Tilt-shift miniature faking, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilt-shift miniature faking. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mfield (Oi!) 05:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Appleton, Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tjrudebeck. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tjrudebeck. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)