Welcome! edit

Hello, TrippyDippy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Space (UK band). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Starman2377 (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey Moon moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Hey Moon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephin Merritt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saratoga. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:ThomasScottQuintetMarionette.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ThomasScottQuintetMarionette.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021 edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Marionette (album) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Marionette (EP). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 14:36, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ThomasScottQuintetMarionette.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ThomasScottQuintetMarionette.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Albums recorded at Parr Street Studios edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Albums recorded at Parr Street Studios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello TrippyDippy! Your additions to Re-Animator (album) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hey Moon edit

  Hello, TrippyDippy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hey Moon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 24 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Music for Pleasure Music for Pain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bury.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021 edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to This Heat. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 7 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dogs in Space (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hey Moon edit

 

Hello, TrippyDippy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hey Moon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 2 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smiling Friends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burbank.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cartoon Network creators edit

 Template:Cartoon Network creators has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Edits edit

Please do not add original research to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions, and also add a brief explanation to the edit summary each time before saving your changes to let others know of your edits. Thank you. Hiddenstranger (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Music for Pleasure Music for Pain edit

Please read WP:NALBUM: "That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article." The fact that the album exists does not make it notable. If you cannot find reliable independent sources about it, this article is liable to be nominated for deletion sooner rather than later. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 15:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Music for Pleasure Music for Pain for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Music for Pleasure Music for Pain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music for Pleasure Music for Pain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Richard3120 (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 13 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Homestar Runner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macromedia Flash.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Space-M4PM4P.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Space-M4PM4P.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

no wp:self published source edit

Per the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore. It is a wp:self published source. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because this source had been included here. Woovee (talk) 03:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Peter Browngardt, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 15:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:MaxTundra-SomeBestFriend.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:MaxTundra-SomeBestFriend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:MaxTundraSomeBestFriend.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:MaxTundraSomeBestFriend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Edits to Moondust for My Diamond edit

Hi. Several months ago, you edited a paragraph of information to Moondust for My Diamond without a source. Please in future make sure you include a source for material that you add to Wikipedia. Thanks. Ss112 11:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mummer edits edit

Hi. I noticed you recently performed a multitude of edits on the page for XTC's Mummer album, including adding a substantial amount of information to the lead and various credits in the personnel section. Please do not add information to Wikipedia without sourcing it, and do not include detailed information in the lead that isn't already discussed in the body of the article (see here). Unsourced conjecture, such as how an album "was generally well received", is particularly unnecessary. Thanks. —The Keymaster (talk) 03:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Once again edit

  Please do not add unsourced content to articles. You've re-added information removed from the lead of Mummer because it was not sourced and not mentioned in the article. The Wikipedia manual of style states: "Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article. As a general rule of thumb, the lead section should contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs and be carefully sourced as appropriate." The reissue information you've added in the body of the article should also not be added without references. —The Keymaster (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Third time edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content and original research to Mummer. This is your third warning. —The Keymaster (talk) 10:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at David Firth (animator). Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 11:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Music for Pleasure Music for Pain. scope_creepTalk 09:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at American Head, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 20:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:XTCMummer.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:XTCMummer.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:SpaceMusicForPleasureMusicForPain.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:SpaceMusicForPleasureMusicForPain.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:XTCMummer.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:XTCMummer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:XTCMummer.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:XTCMummer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TrippyDippy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I wish for my account to be unblocked for I am sick and tired of trying to prove to the mods that a Wikipedia article for the Space album Music for Pleasure Music for Pain is worthy of inclusion. I have done all the research I can to put together a truthful and compelling article, but seems as though my sources just aren't good enough for them. TrippyDippy (talk) 16:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This seems to be a justification for leaving your account blocked, not for lifting your block. If your intention is actually to lift the block, you need to address the reasons that lead to your block and convince us your future edits would be significantly different from your prior edits. Yamla (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

-

I don't understand what I've been doing wrong, I've tried to follow the guidelines the best that I could, and if someone can explain to me the mistakes that I've been making, I will honestly try my very hardest to correct them in future. - TrippyDippy 19:33, 3 April 2023 (BST)

There's a number of different issues--first there's your persistent pattern of adding content to articles without providing proper sources (while some of the warnings on this talk page are old, you seem to have continued this sort of edit, making changes like this one right up until you were blocked. Second, and this is the issue that is most apparent in your first unblock request, you need to abide by the community's consensus, and that means, in the case of Music for Pleasure Music for Pain, you need to accept that the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music for Pleasure Music for Pain was to convert the article to a redirect, and stop contesting the issue further (unless you can provide new sources that sufficiently demonstrate that it meets WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM). signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

But how else could I improve the article with only a limited amount of sources available to me? All the other releases by the band each have articles, and leaving that one out as a redirect feels extremely inconsistent and out of place, regardless of what the consensus has to say about it. - TrippyDippy 20:25, 3 April 2023 (BST)

If there aren't sufficient sources, and particularly if the consensus is in favour of leaving that one out as a redirect, we expect you not to improve the article and instead, leave that one out as a redirect. This is absolutely critical. If you don't understand this, if you don't accept this, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. This is how Wikipedia works. See WP:CONSENSUS, among the many other policies and guidelines you've been linked to. --Yamla (talk) 19:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I thought Wikipedia was supposed to be a free encyclopedia, that allowed information to be shared from all over. Oh well, guess times have changed. - TrippyDippy 20:45, 3 April (BST)

WP:CONSENSUS and WP:GNG have been codified as guidelines/policy in one form or another since 2006. We are first and foremost a collaborative project to build an encyclopedia, which means collectively establishing and following guidelines for inclusion and verifiability, not to be confused for a free for all where everyone is welcome to write whatever they want signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Look, I really do not want to leave this website, nor do I want to stay blocked. Just please tell me exactly what you want me to say so we can get this sorted out. - TrippyDippy 21:07, 3 April (BST)

Well, it's been almost 24 hours and I'm still awaiting a reply. - TrippyDippy 20:06, 4 April (BST)

Don't be rude. We are all volunteers here. We've already pointed you to numerous policies and guidelines. If you haven't read and thoroughly understood those, you are just wasting our time. If you have a specific question, ask it. --Yamla (talk) 19:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't being rude. I was merely making a simple request, and all I received was silence. - TrippyDippy 21:03, 4 April (BST)