User talk:TreyGeek/Archives/2012Q4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Phi Kappa Tau at Texas State
See link below. http://texasstate.phikappatau.org/
Please change back. Thanks..
DXPKT — Preceding unsigned comment added by DXPKT (talk • contribs) 02:10, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Can you provide a reliable secondary source showing that the organization currently has a chapter at Texas State? What you provided is a primary source, which isn't good for verifiability, and the existing references regarding Greek organizations at TxState don't list Phi Kappa Tau. --TreyGeek (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
GA review of Texas State article
I consider it ready to pass. But given that you are still working on areas of it (not essential to passing), it would probably be a nicer sequence and help the article to leave it open a bit longer. I will be mostly or fully off wiki for 6 days, so the finalization of passing could be as late as 6-7 days from now. If you prefer otherwise, Ii could do a fast pass today. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 14:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'll leave the decision of when to pass/fail it. I've been waiting a number of months for GA-review so a week or so longer won't make a big difference to me. Finishing the name change paragraph likely won't happen until sometime this weekend. That is assuming I find more to add, which is no guarantee. The only other planned change on my part is putting 'alt' tags on the images, which appears doesn't make or break the GA-review. It's possible someone could come in during the next week to offer more suggestions. Again, up to you. --TreyGeek (talk) 01:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'll wait. Will be less rushed then. Nice article! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 02:04, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, unless something comes up I think I'm done with expansion for the near future. I don't have reasonings for all of the name changes, but I can't find it for every case. It's interesting that the books and thesis that discuss the history of the university discuss the state of swimwear and the prohibition of courting in the 1920s but not why the university changes its name. Anyhow, all done for now. --TreyGeek (talk) 18:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- I passed it. Congratulations on a high quality and informative article! And also on the work that you have done to bring it over the finish line! Sincereley, North8000 (talk) 16:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, unless something comes up I think I'm done with expansion for the near future. I don't have reasonings for all of the name changes, but I can't find it for every case. It's interesting that the books and thesis that discuss the history of the university discuss the state of swimwear and the prohibition of courting in the 1920s but not why the university changes its name. Anyhow, all done for now. --TreyGeek (talk) 18:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'll wait. Will be less rushed then. Nice article! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 02:04, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
That's awesome. Thanks again for the review. --TreyGeek (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Back at WP:MMA
given you comments at WP:AN and to your todo list, does this mean you are thinking of returing to the project, I hope so. Mtking (edits) 04:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not completely sure yet, it depends on a number of things. Just sending up a few test balloons to judge initial reactions. I'll wait to see how the discussion at WP:AN results and it's possible fall out. I also need to determine how much time I can actually spend working on things. Getting MMABot up and running again will take some attention and time, particularly to get through the first pass after it's layoff. It might also be interesting to see the reaction of the new folks in the WikiProject when they see the list of tasks it performs. Working on UFC 140 shouldn't take too much time as it is in decent shape and I'm morbidly interested to see what PR could turn up from someone who hasn't been involved with the MMA mess. Guess I'm just looking for something to do, especially since my other todo list items aren't exciting me at the moment. --TreyGeek (talk) 05:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
MMA Event Notability
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:MMA#MMA_Event_Notability. Kevlar (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)