If you research, research scandal of your Rev. organisation. Pl. go and check Japapnese events records. Don't forget pocketing of God's wealth and killing of Pankaj Trivedi. Killfalsehood 10:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Welcome

edit

Hello, Traver Rebello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!. I wish you good luck on the tough endeavor you have undertaken.Bakaman 17:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am not removing any megasaysay link knowingly. Traver, I don't know your involvement in Swadhyay but we know Dada and his deviation from spiritual activities. Dada claimed that he had no inclination for material wealth and fame but in fact, they were the greatest lies. Dada transferred all God's wealth which formally he may not have appealed but motivated people to take a share out for God's work but at the end gave it to Didi. He was not able to give it in normal way as the wealth was in charitable trusts so he made her trustees in all trusts. Do you realise no incometax was paid on this income of trusts but at the same time it exempted incometax to the donor? This is anti-national when the wealth is put in control of one person or one family. This is grossly im-moral. Dada taught moral to the world but pity he became im-moral. You and I, who may be earning hardly enough to survive pay income tax. Don't be sentimental, be neutral and stand by the truth and not person. We considered Dada like our father but we have seen Dada inciting his un-intelligent and un-educateby by telling lies to be violent against old dedicated followers who threw their lives for nurturing his activities. Pathans are considered dangerous yet they don't cause damage to the people whose hospitality they enjoyed (Ate salt). Dada mis-interpreted Geeta and from Vyas-Pith incited people to level false character allegations against his old followers and kill them on whose dedication and money, Dada got name and fame and Dada got his bread and butter. In the process, Pankaj Trivedi was killed but luckily all attempts to kill Hemrajbhai, Maheshbhai, Jagdishbhai, Hitu, Vinodbhai Shah, Shankerbhai Thakkar did not succeed. Killfalsehood 04:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

swadhyay

edit

The article has been protected by an admin after being the victim of a massive edit war. I have started a discussion at Talk:Swadhyay_Parivar#Protected and I hope you will join me in attempting to reach a consensus on the article. Thank you.Bakaman 03:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bachchan

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Bachchan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this:   which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 00:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply