Demon

edit

Hey there! I see you were having some trouble adding content to the Demon article. Please note that article already has many issues, most notably the lack of references. Since you added a substantial amount of more unsourced material, I felt this warranted removal. On Wikipedia, we aim to keep things well-sourced, so that everything is verifiable. Learn more at WP:REFBEGIN. I realize your edit was in good faith and I hope understand why I reverted it. Let me know if you need any help. Cheers — MusikAnimal talk 01:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and some of the content you added was not formatted correctly. Surely this was an accident. Remember you can preview your changes before saving, so as to not deploy apparent "test edits" to a live article. Thanks! — MusikAnimal talk 01:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Travbm/sandbox (January 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Your draft article, User:Travbm/sandbox

edit
 

Hello Travbm. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Travbm/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Travbm, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Travbm/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, Travbm. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm talk 19:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Satoshi Nakamoto. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Retimuko (talk) 22:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply