Welcome! edit

 
Welcome!

Hello, Transvampire, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! DanielRigal (talk) 14:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020 edit

  Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Blanchard's transsexualism typology, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Roller26 (talk) 11:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blanchard's transsexualism typology. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Rationalwiki is not a reliable and independent source. Calling something pseudoscience has a very high bar, which this clearly does not clear. Don't undo this, if you want start a section on the talk page for determining consensus. Roller26 (talk) 12:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Rationalwiki is considered high factual and pro science by media bias/fact check https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rationalwiki/ what would it take way for blanchards typology to be consdered pseudoscience like scientific Rasism, the anti vaccine movement, or creationismTransvampire (talk) 12:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
RationalWiki is great but it doesn't fit our definition of a Reliable Source. These two things are not as incompatible as they may at first seem because our specific definition of a Reliable Source goes beyond the colloquial meaning of the term. RationalWiki is user generated content and that is never going to meet our criteria. This is not to disparage the quality of what they have made at all; It really is good stuff. Nor is it hypocrisy because Wikipedia applies that exact same rule to itself. We can't reference one Wikipedia article to another one because Wikipedia does not regard itself as being a Reliable Source.
I've replied to your comment on the article's talk page talking about the specifics of this as it applies to Blanchard's nonsense.
Anyway, I appreciate that this is all confusing and frustrating. Unfortunately, getting started on Wikipedia can be like that. Please do not be discouraged. I see that you didn't get a standard Welcome message. I'll add that at the top of the page as that has a lot of links to help you get started. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Transvampire, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Transvampire! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)