User talk:Train of Knowledge/2021

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-bics

Template:Uw-bics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bsherr (talk) 18:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

What to do with User:LOLICONSUPREMACIST

Hi Train of Knowledge. Hope you're doing well. I do not know what to do with LOLICONSUPREMACIST, he has removed my comments on their talk page and accusing me of vandalism and got into an edit war. Since you reported that user onto UAA, could you please let them know that their behaviour needs to stop?

Thanks, AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 03:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I was just resting. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 21:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Closing CFDs

Hi, I understand that you are taking a break, and that anyway you were taking a break from XFDs, but I hope this may be useful for the future.

Thanks for closing Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_11#Category:Taipei_Metro_stations_by_line; the decision is fine, but it doesn't look as if you took any action to implement it. WP:CFDAI has the full instructions for admins; as a non-admin, you can either implement a close manually, or list it at WT:CFDW for an admin to pass the instructions to a bot. – Fayenatic London 09:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Edits on psychpathy (March 2021)

No problem, the edit you reverted was actually just a typo fix to a word. The anon edit after that however was actually a vandalism.--OpenNotes1 (talk) 23:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewing

Thank you for the >15 changes you reviewed today, really appreciate you clearing the backlog :) Justiyaya (talk) 11:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your welcome :) Train of Knowledge (Talk) 21:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Username report

How does "Denis senis" look inappropriate to you? - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 00:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Okay. So, the name 'Denis' by itself isn't inappropriate and often refers to a genuine real-life name. However, when you add the word 'Senis' to the end of it it looks suspiciously like someone is circumventing the username filters when they really mean 'penis penis'. That would be like if I made a user name saying 'Wuck Guck' when I really mean 'Fuck Fuck' to circumvent the username filters. Disruptive editors and LTAs often have ways of trying to circumvent username filters like for example replacing the letter 'V' with 'W' for vandal or 'J' for 'I' for admin. Senis is not really a legitimate last name for a real life person, and if it is it is most likely a dead coincidence. I'm not saying this user is a VOA or LTA but it is very unlikely for a constructive editor to have two words that rhymes with bad words as usernames. Next time I will give a warning as it may not be a blatant violation but I will just let the user know anyways. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 09:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Actually, I've given the user a warning anyways. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 09:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello.

Why was my edit (see here) reverted by you and labeled as a false positive. I don't see how it constitutes vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eiore (talk • contribs) 14:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

@Eiore:, you shouldn't put your own opinions about people on their pages (positive or negative). Personal commentary on someone's article is not encyclopaedic, no matter how much you love or hate them. Keep your opinions to yourself, and do not let them disrupt your editing. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 23:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Avicii

Hey there, please carefully look through the relevant sources when going through the pending changes. The edit you accepted on the Avicii page wasn't properly cited, as the TMZ article it was going off of itself states that the sources they were using contradict each other so the content that was added isn't clear and shouldn't have been included as if it is fact. I've fixed it already so don't worry about it, just wanted to give you a heads up for the future. Cheers. --TylerBurden (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)