Tradtional healer in South Africa
Tradtional healer in South Africa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Insert your reason to be unblocked here
Decline reason:
Editor has provided interesting ideas for contemplation on the methodology of guidelines enforcement on Wikipedia but no reason why s/he should be unblocked .Chetsford (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello Mr Alex, well I thanks you for blocking from editing, as it was apart of leston for you teachingnme on the policies of how wikipedia works like.
Now that i have know your rules, its no more of use to keep me blocked because i promise not to advertise my self any more here however i will keep conteibuting more wisedom to majority over wikipedia because i see alot of contribution over here where by some one them are trying to pull out some points but due to lack of enough information on what they are talking of they end up educating people with in appropriate information.
Of which you may find that some people who may have the real data on what is needed they are blocked down they cant eidit.
As well I would request wikipedia to adapt some skills of behaving professionally. Before blocking aperson its worthy to give aperson a warning first then a person must revise him, or her self on what mistake is done then failiure aperson to revise his /her mistake that is when he can be blocked i guse 14 working days can be enough warning for aperson to revise his/her mistakes.
Some people would like to use your services but as well reading the entire wikipedia its like reading a full bible so its really hard for some people that is why you finding uour self blocking more than 200 people per day.
Rather than blocking 200 people per day, better give warning to 200 people per day and teach them on what you need. Those 200 people blocked you may find that they have good contribution towards the people in the world may be even better than the one accepeted.
So wikipedia is mistaken be forgetting to implement proffetional ethics just like blocked wikipedia users misteken and forget to read the wikipedia rules.
October 2019 edit
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Spam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] GermanJoe (talk) 08:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf(talk) 09:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Promotional editing in userspace edit
Hello, promotional editing is prohibited everywhere in Wikipedia, including userspace. Please do not add any further promotional content or link spam to your user talkpage or your talkpage access will be revoked. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Using several accounts edit
Hello Tradtional healer in South Africa, you may not have been aware of this policy, but the usage of several accounts is generally prohibited on Wikipedia (aside from a few exceptional cases for legitimate project-related reasons). I have blocked User:SANGOMAS IN SOUTH AFRICA accordingly. Please stick to your original user account here for any further questions or requests to be unblocked. GermanJoe (talk) 11:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)