Torshavn1337

Torshavn1337, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Torshavn1337! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

International rankings of Turkey

added a link pointing to Fig

List of Turkish regions by Human Development Index

added a link pointing to Aegean

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Torshavn1337

Thank you for creating Dominican Republic–Turkey relations.

User:Dps04, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article. While articles documenting bilateral relations between recognized sovereign states are almost always notable (and hence why I approved the article), there are a few points to note for this article and further articles on this subject area that you may wish to create:

1. The article as is currently written is overly dependent on a single source, namely information extracted from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, which also is primary source for information about Turkey. I have therefore tagged the article as such. It would be great if you can expand the article with secondary sources independent of the governments of the country in question.
2. There is little description of the actual bilateral relations of the countries in question, but rather a comparison of the key statistics of the countries. More information of the former through subsequent expansion would be welcome.
3. Never cite other Wikipedia articles as a source. I have removed the reference per WP:CIRC, which you may want to read for your interest.
4. When citing the same source for more than once, please consider usually the parameter <ref name>. This would be better than citing the same reference from the Foreign Ministry of Turkey in seven different reference items, for example. You may ask me for details if you are unsure how to.
5. Remember the importance of stub categorization and inclusion of relevant Wikiprojects template in the article’s talk page. I have done it for the reviewed article this time.

Hope this is of some help and happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dps04}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dps04 (talk) 06:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Additions reverted

Hello Torshavn1337, sorry but I have reverted quite a number of your recent additions.

When editing about international relations, please keep the following in mind:

• Do not create new bilateral relations pages just for the sake of completeness. Wikipedia does not want and does not need articles on every conceivable pair of countries. Bilateral relations articles should only be created if there is something notable to say about them, beyond the trivial details of who has an embassy where and routine factsheet listings of economic data.
• Do not start bilateral relations articles with sentences of the form "X-Y relations are relations between X and Y". These intro sentences are tautological and therefore nonsensical. I'm aware you may have found such sentences in many existing articles and they may have given you the impression they are somehow standard; but they are not. They are just a bad habit of editors who created articles on topics they didn't actually have anything to write about.
• Do not add foreign translations of the terms "X-Y relations" in the languages of X and Y in the lead sentences. This is useless lead sentence bloat. We provide foreign equivalents of article titles only in the case of proper nouns (such as place names that have different native and English versions). These phrases here aren't proper nouns but mere descriptions. The fact that "German-Turkish relations" is "Deutsch-türkische Beziehungen" in German is not a notable fact about German-Turkish relations themselves, but merely a trivial fact about the German language.
• Also, the big "comparison tables" are contentious and there is currently no consensus that articles should have them. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

@Future Perfect at Sunrise: I hope this is the right way to send a message. I'm not sure -- thank you fort he comments, I really appreciate them! If I may just add my two cents about foreign equivalents, sometimes knowing the foreign equivalents are dead useful. For instance, looking at foreign relations of, say, Iceland and Myanmar, if you know the foreign equivalent of Iceland-Myanmar relations, you can use Google to look for sources online and use Google Translate to get a rough idea. I do that frequently. That's why I was adding foreign equivalents. I think there's some functional use for them. Maybe a little too marginal, but oh well. Torshavn1337 (talk) 07:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, well, why would somebody want to use foreign-language sources if they can't read them? And if they can read the language, wouldn't they know the foreign term for "X-Y relations" on their own? Or, if they are prepared to use Google translate to help them understand the foreign sources, couldn't they just as well use it to find the translation for "X-Y relations" too? How did you yourself find out these translations in all these different languages? (BTW, yes, this was quite the right way to reply; thanks for that.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Uzbekistan–Turkey relations moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Uzbekistan–Turkey relations, is not about diplomatic relations between two states, but merely a comparative table. Please expand on the topic and support with citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Torshavn1337

Thank you for creating Andorra–Turkey relations.

User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for this interesting new article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Torshavn1337

Thank you for creating Panama–Turkey relations.

User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Haiti–Turkey relations

Hello Torshavn1337,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Haiti–Turkey relations for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 12:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Latvia–Turkey relations

Hello Torshavn1337,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Latvia–Turkey relations for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Estonia–Turkey relations

Hello Torshavn1337,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Estonia–Turkey relations for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 22:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of Sudan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright infringement

I can see that you are a new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Estonia–Turkey relations. The infringing text has been removed because the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web. When creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Outline of Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leven.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Custom styles on Turkey-related Navboxes

Hi Torshavn1337! I can see you've been adding custom styles to quite a lot of Turkey-related Navboxes recently. I'm conscious that the guidance for the Navbox template says "Styles are generally advised against, to maintain consistency among templates and pages in Wikipedia". The colours you've chosen don't seem to bear any relation to the national colours of Turkey, and to my eye they clash pretty badly with each other. I just wondered if there was a particular reason for going away from the default Navbox styles, which serve perfectly well generally? ninety:one (reply on my talk) 10:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

{{Re|Ninetyon}}. Hi! I was using the color turquoise -- the only color named after Turkey. That's the connection. I tried using the flag colors of red and white -- but it ended up standing out a little too much. And obviously you wouldn't be able to see Turkish flag clearly.~~~~

Oh, right! I must admit I would have never put those two together. It seems that the only relationship between turquoise and Turkey is that latter was the route by which the former came to Europe, which is not a hugely strong connection. I've just seen a turquoise navbox with the Turkish flag and it's really jarring on the eyes. That combination of blue/greens (outline, background, link) is going to make things difficult to read for some people as well. The vast majority of naxboxes use the default styles and that is absolutely fine - perhaps we don't need any custom styles at all? I'm really not sure this is a great idea to be honest with you. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 16:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

{{Re|Ninetyon}}. Thanks for your input about the color clash! I'm going to keep that in mind and ask around -- if people feel strongly about it, I'm more than willing to revert everything back or use a different color combination.

Re: problems with reading, I actually thought very hard about this -- as I'm color blind and have an easy time with the color blue. In fact, blue is an easy color for people with color blindness to deal with, which also incidentally why the Facebook logo is blue (Mark Zuckerberg is color blind).

There's more of a connection than what the Wikipedia article on the color turquoise would have you believe. Turquoise was really named after the (1) Iznik pottery that is used in (2) palaces like the Topkapı Palace and (3) mosques like the Sultan Ahmed Mosque, which is called the Blue mosque. The (4) Evil-eye -- omnipresent in Turkey -- is blue, Turks used to (5) worship the sky before converting to Judaism/Christianity/Islam; (6) flag of the Turkic council is turquoise to reflect this... (7) Many doors are painted blue in Turkey (example: pinterest.com/pin/400468591849079110/) That's what I can think of in less than 5 minutes.~~~~

Minor

I see that you mark almost all your edits as minor, even when they most definitely are not. Please read WP:MINOR about when to mark and when not to mark edits as minor. --T*U (talk) 12:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

{{Re|TU-nor}}. Hi! Thank you so much for letting me know about this -- I must admit that I haven't given it much thought before.~~~~

Template categorization

Torshavn1337, please note, that adding categories inside a navbox, as you did in Special:Diff/987975333, is not correct. Please read the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization#Template categorization. —⁠andrybak (talk) 20:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Index of Turkey-related articles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages White cheese, Sarma and Michael Wright.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Please respond

Your comment at Talk:Eastern Anatolia Region#Removal of Category would be much appreciated. --T*U (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Many of your recent edits have been removed in whole or in part, as it appears you added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder of this document. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts and doing so as a way to continue violating our copyright policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa (talk) 13:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Creating the account User:Mjolnir8888 to continue to add content to Wikipedia that violates our copyright policy is a violation of both our sock puppetry policy and our copyright policy. I am going to roll back all edits by the sock account. Please post here if you have any questions or comments.— Diannaa (talk) 13:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC) I have decided to change the block to indefinite as this is such an egregious violation of our policies. — Diannaa (talk) 14:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Uzbekistan–Turkey relations

Hello, Torshavn1337. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Uzbekistan–Turkey relations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Uzbekistan–Turkey relations

Hello, Torshavn1337. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Uzbekistan–Turkey relations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ended Turkish television series

Template:Ended Turkish television series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 14:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Liechtenstein–Turkey relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liechtenstein–Turkey relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liechtenstein–Turkey relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pilaz (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saint Lucia–Turkey relations

The article Saint Lucia–Turkey relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Total lack of notable relations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Antigua and Barbuda–Turkey relations

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current Turkish television series

Template:Current Turkish television series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 02:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Comoros–Turkey relations

The article Comoros–Turkey relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only has 1 primary source. Fails GNG. Reading list provided does not even mention Turkey.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Belize–Turkey relations

The article Belize–Turkey relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Marked for notability concerns 2 years ago. Based on a single primary source and fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)