Topology in my soul
Speedy deletion nomination of Nata con Fresas (song) edit
Hello Topology in my soul,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nata con Fresas (song) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —Swpbtalk 18:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Nata con Fresas (song) edit
Hello, Topology in my soul,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Nata con Fresas (song) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nata con Fresas (song) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Lyrics in Nata con Fresas (song) edit
Hi, normally we cannot have lyrics included in an article about a song, because the lyrics have a copyright, and no permission has been granted to reuse them. However if you wrote the lyrics yourself, or they are public domain, then you could use them. However you need to provide evidence that the lyrics are free to use. A direct translation to English is a derivative and cannot be used either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
(Topology in my soul): Hi. Sorry you are right, I didn't know it. In this case I'm pretty sure that the lyrics doesn't have copyright, but I realise that it's not correct to include them in the article.
Topology in my soul, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Topology in my soul! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
Links edit
Hello.
You seems to have written a link as topological group. That way the reader sees "topological group" and when clicking on the link goes to the article titled topological group, with a notice at the top of the page saying "Redirected from Topological groups. There is no reason to go through that redirect page. The plural "topological groups" is inappropriate as an article title because it is plural without any special need for it to be plural. Maxwell's equations is an example of an article title that is appropriately plural; "topological groups" is not. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014 edit
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Extension of a topological group with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 18:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Answer: I removed the section "extensions of topological abelian groups by the unit circle" because it is too specific for this article and it is also irrelevant