Your submission at Articles for creation: New Rockstars (December 15)

edit

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:New Rockstars|cv=no|reason=v|details=|reason2=npov|details2=|comment=See [[WP:CITEOVERKILL] and WP:RS.|sig=yes}}

 
Hello, TonyStank123456789! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 03:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Rockstars (January 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Perryprog were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Perryprog (talk) 01:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi TonyStank123456789! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I need help with my article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:New Rockstars, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Rockstars (April 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hellknowz were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
—  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 12:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SuperCarlinBrothers (July 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Doric Loon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: After being declined, reworked and resubmitted twice, this draft still contains nothing to demonstrate any real importance for an encyclopedia. The citations are trivial. The claims made about the subjects' achievements really are not more than those of many bloggers. I don't think number of views in itself gives notability. I suggest waiting five years and then considering if by then these vloggers have made waves.
Doric Loon (talk) 12:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply