Tomrocksocks

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomrocksocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not know what I was blocked for. Materialscientist blocked me, but he did not correct any of my changes, so I do not know what I was blocked for Tomrocksocks (talk) 7:27 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Bollocks. You know exactly what you were blocked for, and this attempt at wikilawyering serves to convince me that an indefinite block on your account is entirely justified. You get one more shot; if you make another request like this, expect your talkpage access to be revoked as well. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You know perfectly well what you were blocked for - I've just had a quick look at your edit history and it is blatantly obvious! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)