User talk:Tommi1986/Archive 2023

Description of Megaman

I described the changes why I removed the info. Not only was one portion not cited without a citation but Megaman X Legacy Collection needs a page by itself. Check the pages I have a log of the description, 2601:642:4400:9F00:C8E4:3ED:4BC6:C571 (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with Whodattt

It was so frustrating not being able to deal with him as I’m involved but he’s indefinitely blocked now. Of course he’s been using IPs to sock, so… Doug Weller talk 20:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

No worries, I have the pages on my watchlist in case any IPs sneak back! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 20:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

They probably will, thanks. Doug Weller talk 18:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Important notice regarding Gabrielle Wolohojian

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:Barack Obama—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Big oopsie! My apology. I struck out my erroneous warning. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

I thought it was a glitch in the Matrix Huggle. Adakiko (talk) 11:06, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

No worries at all, easily done, I've done it before!!! Have a good day! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 11:06, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Am first cousin of Sanjay jha , hence i edited .

Thanks for your reply. I don't know how to upload document . I just added village name and name of my uncle and aunty. Namanvanshthakur (talk) 09:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Adam Riess

Hi this is Adam Riess. I was trying to edit my entry to add my list of doctoral students, some prizes won, updates to citation statistics and articles and recent research. You reverted this and I am not sure why I cannot do this? 130.167.171.218 (talk) 19:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

反共抗獨光復신의

I suspect that 反共抗獨光復신의 (talk · contribs) is a member of the ever-growing CarlostheJackal01 sock menagerie. I filled a report wp:Sockpuppet investigations/CarlostheJackal01 Google translates "反共抗獨光復" as Chinese to "Anti-Communist Anti-Independence" and "신의" Korean for "faith". Running out of names? Thanks for the AIV report! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@Adakiko: Yes I did have a suspicion about that but had no basis to make that accusation but thanks for saying it too, at least someone else thought the same me!! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 19:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

I looked at the sock report again - the checker was looking at the editor before I added the report. I'm superfluous! Sock reports can be such a pain. I wonder if there is a tool? Adakiko (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Lincoln Allison

I'm sorry, I got completely confused there. You were reverting vandalism and for some reason I thought you were perpetrating it. My profound apologies. I shall try to be more attentive.Sammyrice (talk) 22:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hey, no worries, it happens!! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 08:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Breakdancing History

I removed the notions that falsely linked the artform to 'Rob Roy on the Baltic', which is information no founding breakdancer would have come across nor had access to. If you Google Giesse Harad Polska or 'salmon district dance' not only is there no info in relation to breaking but virtually none at all. Also, a black and white picture of a teenage boy doing downwork in Moscow is misleading; breaking started in the Bronx and photos under its history section should reflect that.

Dance moves displayed by Conrad "Little Buck" Buckner, as well as other African-American performers from the '40s and '50s, were the precursors of what you see in breakdancing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpV2Xl4e4YQ ConstantKay (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Guidingangel

They have a point. That section is unsourced and it's a BLP. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Ashley Graham (Resident Evil) - Article not Neutral / Heavily biased

Hello,

The article about Ashley Graham from Resident Evil 4, specifically the updated version from the recent remake (2023), of which has been controversially changed to be "less sexualized", appears to be heavily biased towards those who wanted the changes and against those who did not.

To start, I am fairly confident that the majority of people, both in the West and in Asia, not only enjoyed the fan service of Ashley Graham in the original game, but enjoy fan service in pretty much any game that it appears in.

Once again, a handful of loud people on Twitter and a handful of virtue-signaling journalists get treated as if their views are that of the majority. Due to the sheer loudness of their shouting and screaming, as well as the fact that they have access to the entire "journalistic" apparatuses.

When in reality, I really think you would be hard pressed to find a real life person who agrees with any kind of puritanical censorship, especially as it becomes a horrifyingly fast growing trend.

Colleges and universities used to be a place of the most open discussion possible. Now they are places where anyone even slightly outside the opinions your are told you must hold get chased off campus with torches and pitchforks.

Similarly, the West and the United States in particular used to be the anti-censorship bastion. Free speech. Free art. Free comedy. Free expression. Now?... Even a SKIRT for god's sake is considered "sexualization" and "misogyny". Actually 1984.

But back to THIS article. Over and over and over and over again, the opinions of a handful of game journalists are touted as the truth. "So much better!" "OMG you go girl!" "Yassss! We think this is great for gaming!"

But nobody in the real world agrees with these weirdos. We like skirts. We like girls. We like 2B from Nier. We like sexy anime ladies. And we like fan service. I bet you not less than 90% of people who play the game would agree the censorship is ridiculous.

But in THREE different sections you tout the views and opinions and quotes of these terminally online, virtue signaling, Kim Jong Un level propagandized "journalists" and treat it as if it is fact, or is the majority opinion of the gaming community. It is neither.

So either remove the propaganda, or put some legitimate counterpoints to the pro-censorship pontifications in the article.

Thank you 2600:1700:1EF0:9E30:7437:CE77:FB6B:6F8F (talk) 22:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Think you got the wrong guy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_on_the_Internet

Quote: "Especially after 2017, many accounts under the name of nationalism were created on YouTube and TikTok these accounts mostly belonged to Indians or Arabs. After 2020, many more racially and religiously motivated accounts appeared on TikTok many of which are still active posting a lot of hateful videos, and these accounts are painfully Christian or Muslim Religious nationalists"

Help with Philosophical pessimism and Antinatalism#Asymmetry between good and bad things

Hello there! I see you've been quite active in some things related to the above mentioned pages. I'm pinging you @Tommi1986: directly to ask for some help. I've started 3 initiatives for these pages. If you could spare some time in the near future, could you please take a look at the proposal and voice your opinion? Of course, if you have interest, time, and energy to participate that would be amazing!

Here are the projects:

1. Talk:Philosophical_pessimism#A proposal for an overhaul of the article — this initiative is already in progress. The idea is to raise the quality of the page by switching it from a mere historical account to a more encyclopedic format.

2. Talk:Philosophical_pessimism#A proposal to split the History into a dedicated page — related to the one above. The historical account is overly detailed. It would be much better to have a dedicated page for the history of philosophical pessimism and leave only a brief history in the main page.

3. Talk:Antinatalism#A proposal to create a dedicated page for Benatar's axiological asymmetry — here, the idea is to extract the axiological asymmetry argument into a dedicated page. This way, a more detailed presentation could be given. In addition, we could expand on the various responses others philosophers made and counters from Benatar. Other pages could have a brief description and link to the details page.

I hope at least some of this will spark your interest! Fantastiera (talk) 21:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Weirdly, this one wasn't vandalism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Canton,_Massachusetts&oldid=1100016033

The judge rotenberger school legitimately has been condenned by the UN, now, whether it has a place in the article for canton is up for debate, but no, that one is in canton, and is a school known for alleged torture. - a local.

Heyallkatehere (talk) 20:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

You made a mistake

Thats the WP:LEAD[1], it doesn't require a source... Its a summary of the given article. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

This comment has been placed in response to the solicitation to do so in the event that you made a mistake posted on my talk page [2]. I would appreciate it if you could engage with this issue and explain why you made the mistake you did and what actions you're going to take to ensure that such disruption doesn't happen again. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)