Welcome! edit

Hello, Tomaten05! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Shellwood (talk) 17:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Proposed deletion of Eberhard von Vegesack edit

 

The article Eberhard von Vegesack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. No sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 14:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axel Otto Mörner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good article icon edit

  Hello! I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions has been undone because it added the Good Article template to Finnish War, an article that has not been promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. If you believe that this article meets the Good Article Criteria, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the Good Article nominating instructions. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Good Article Nominations talk page. Thank you. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 13 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Reims (1814), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French Empire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Flamingokvintetten (band) edit

Hello Tomaten05,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Flamingokvintetten (band) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Streaplers (band) edit

Hello Tomaten05,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Streaplers (band) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lennart Matikainen edit

Hello Tomaten05,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lennart Matikainen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Streaplers (band) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Streaplers (band), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Saab 17 Undos edit

Care to explain your blanket undos on Saab 17? I made a considerable number of corrections to formatting and grammar whose erasing cannot be readily justified. - NiD.29 (talk) 15:23, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why are you making changes in the information box? All of the information is correct and even the format is clean. You deleted the caption without any reason. Feel free to fix grammar and images but don't do changes in the information box. Leave it be.

That still doesn't justify your edit warring and lack of edit summaries.
The caption is unnecessary and doesn't add anything useful (no one cares that it is at a particular airshow on a particuar date, and the inclusion of that is making is VERY UNclean), and that doesn't explain your reversal of all the OTHER changes I made. If they really want that information, it is with the image. The first image has one job - illustrate the aircraft that the page is about.
Empty fields that do not need to be included.
Changes to convert + abbr=on to cvt, and adding cvt calls where previously it was in the old format.
Formatting changes to botched page layouts
Extra sources I added.
Before you revert changes, perhaps you should actually read all of the changes you are reverting - there is still no justification for you undoing what I did. There is a reason this page is a C, and you are standing in the way of it being improved to the level of a B page. - NiD.29 (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Your caption isn't even correct, as it is not a Swedish Air Force aircraft, as it isn't on the strength of the Swedish Air Force, but rather a museum. Information that can be added to the other image of the same aircraft further down the page. - NiD.29 (talk) 15:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Some final comments - I wasn't the first person you blindly reverted - pages you edit are not "owned" by you and can be altered by anyone, with the only restrictions being that changes be supported by references, and that the formatting style/date style/language style remain as is, if there isn't a good reason to change it. If you are interested in improving articles, random spaces and weird formatting that bloat the page is not the way to do it (most of the world pays for data, and page size should minimized for the material provided). Your 63 Saab 17 edits made zero difference to the quality of the page but added substantially to wikipedia's archive storage requirements (which costs money). To make a difference, you need sources, and to add material, which you have not done. First thing I did was download several books that had substantial information on the Saab 17. - NiD.29 (talk) 21:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Swebbtv moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Swebbtv, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 18:58, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2020 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Saab 17 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 13:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Stefano Rota moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Stefano Rota, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2021 edit

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 11 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Williams (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 18 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Righeira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alphaville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Righeira edit

Do you plan on adding any reliable sources to these albums? As stated, Discogs is not an indication of notability. Richard3120 (talk) 14:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm trying to search for sources and I want to make individual articles for Righeira's albums because there's not much content overall about them.

I understand that, but you should wait until you actually have the sources before creating the articles. Richard3120 (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Please stop continuing to create articles for Righeira albums with no evidence of notability, when you still haven't provided any sources for the earlier ones. None of these articles come anywhere close to passing WP:NALBUM and there is a very high probability that they will be nominated for deletion. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 16:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Righeira (Righeira album) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Righeira (Righeira album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Righeira (Righeira album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 15:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bambini Forever for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bambini Forever is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bambini Forever until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 16:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Vamos a la playa (Righeira album) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vamos a la playa (Righeira album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vamos a la playa (Righeira album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 13:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Roland Hassel moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Roland Hassel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KylieTastic (talk) 16:03, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Streaplers (band) edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Streaplers (band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rodoljub Vulović edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rodoljub Vulović requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodoljub Vulović (3rd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Streaplers (band) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Streaplers (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Already exists at Streaplers

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. nearlyevil665 13:48, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tumba-Tarzan moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Tumba-Tarzan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Olof K. Gustafsson edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Olof K. Gustafsson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olof K. Gustafsson. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lennart Matikainen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edit restored unsourced and incorrect information (e.g. "the popular alternative media channel Swebbtv") restored inappropriate external links, removed sources – the only independent/reliable sources that currently exist in the article, as a matter of fact – removed sourced information, and restored very poorly written text. Please don't do that sort of thing. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lennart Matikainen for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lennart Matikainen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lennart Matikainen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Margareta Strömstedt moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Margareta Strömstedt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 01:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Stefano Rota edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stefano Rota, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefano Rota (June 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tomaten05! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finnish War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Swebbtv edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Swebbtv".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 00:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Polisen i Strömstad for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polisen i Strömstad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polisen i Strömstad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Polisen i Strömstad episodes for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Polisen i Strömstad episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polisen i Strömstad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Translations from other Wikipedia versions edit

Hi Tomaten05, when you create a new article at en.wiki by translating a sv.wiki article, as you did with Alf Nilsson, you have to add an attribution to the original. The process is described here. Secondly, please don't use any machine translated text in article space; if you do use a machine translation as your starting point, please put it in your user space or Draft: space to begin with, and make sure to revise it thoroughly before moving it to mainspace or submitting it for review. As an aside, it is usually much easier to write the article from scratch instead of translating an existing article, because it's too easy to get stuck in sentence structures and phrases in the original language that make no sense in the target language. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 08:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Branko Pantelić moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Branko Pantelić, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

"The band is back together" or "The band are back together" edit

I saw your edit at the Frankie Goes to Hollywood article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frankie_Goes_to_Hollywood&diff=1035792179&oldid=1034368968). Man did I open a can of worms researching who was right on this one. The Soundgarden and R.E.M. pages use the singular "was," while Pink Floyd and The Beatles use the plural "were." Do you know have a MOS somewhere that highlights this? I can't find anything definitive online. I did see an interesting discussion about sports teams, though. Apparently the plural is used when discussing the Lakers (for example) that includes the players, i.e. "The Lakers/Heat/Thunder/Jazz are a basketball team" but you should use the singular when discussing the front office, i.e. "The Lakers organization is doing a good job..." Incerto501 (talk) 04:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Righeira navbox templates edit

Hi – you've misunderstood the purpose of these templates. They are not supposed to provide a complete discography of the artist, they are supposed to contain all the articles related to the artist so you can jump between them easily. You already have a complete discography in the Righeira discography article. As almost none of the templates have any links at all, they serve no purpose, so I will nominate them for deletion. Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 18:49, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Righeira albums edit

 Template:Righeira albums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 19:16, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Righeira compilations edit

 Template:Righeira compilations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 19:17, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Righeira filmography and videography edit

 Template:Righeira filmography and videography has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 19:17, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Righeira (Righeira album) edit

 Template:Righeira (Righeira album) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 19:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Righeira singles edit

 Template:Righeira singles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 19:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stefan Ljungqvist moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Stefan Ljungqvist, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 04:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lotten Strömstedt moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Lotten Strömstedt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:22, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Roland Hassel edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roland Hassel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Roland Hassel edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roland Hassel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Tumba-Tarzan edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tumba-Tarzan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Streaplers (band) edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Streaplers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Margareta Strömstedt edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Margareta Strömstedt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Björn Tarras-Wahlberg moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Björn Tarras-Wahlberg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Tumba-Tarzan edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tumba-Tarzan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Margareta Strömstedt edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Margareta Strömstedt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefano Rota (November 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Branko Pantelić edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Branko Pantelić, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022 edit

  Hi Tomaten05! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Paul McCartney. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Branko Pantelić edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Branko Pantelić".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Stefan Ljungqvist edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stefan Ljungqvist, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Lotten Strömstedt edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lotten Strömstedt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lotten Strömstedt edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lotten Strömstedt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Righeira albums edit

 Template:Righeira albums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2022 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Righeira, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your edits were unexplained, unverified, unencyclopedic in tone. Drmies (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Björn Tarras-Wahlberg edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Björn Tarras-Wahlberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Righeira compilation albums edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Righeira compilation albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infobox edit

I want to ask why you change the infobox information of singers from Infobox musical artist to Infobox person? All singers should have the Infobox musical artist format. So please do not change that formatting. Regards.BabbaQ (talk) 18:23, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Björn Tarras-Wahlberg edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Björn Tarras-Wahlberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Righeira song articles edit

I think the articles you have created recently for Righeira songs such as "Italians A Go-Go" and "Tanzen Mit Righeira" are not notable and do not pass WP:NSONG. Most of them use unreliable and user-generated sources such as Discogs, and they simply state facts such as who wrote the song, and which albums it appears on – this does not make a song notable. By the way, your translation of the Rolling Stone article on "Tanzen Mit Righeira" is wrong – it's actually an insult, he is saying that the song is even more dumb than the usual Italo-disco songs. Richard3120 (talk) 18:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Stefano Rota edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stefano Rota".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Johnson Righeira has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Johnson Righeira has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merger of Template:Righeira singles edit

 Template:Righeira singles has been nominated for merging with Template:Righeira. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bambini Forever (2nd nomination) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bambini Forever (2nd nomination) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bambini Forever (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Richard3120 (talk) 16:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I don't see why the article is nominated for deletion. Tomaten05 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
It's explained in the nomination discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bambini Forever (2nd nomination). Richard3120 (talk) 19:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Johnson Righeira edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Johnson Righeira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Tomaten05,
Please do not recreate pages that have been deleted through deletion discussions like CFD or AFD. They will be tagged for speedy deletion, CSD G4. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fancy has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Fancy has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Markus (singer) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Markus (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:German pop rock singers edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:German pop rock singers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Singers from Bad Camberg edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Singers from Bad Camberg indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainers from Bad Camberg edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainers from Bad Camberg indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Bad Camberg by occupation edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Bad Camberg by occupation indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Music in Bad Camberg edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Music in Bad Camberg indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Culture in Bad Camberg edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Culture in Bad Camberg indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:La Bionda has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:La Bionda has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:La Bionda edit

 Template:La Bionda has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Swedish rock musicians templates edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Swedish rock musicians templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira - Oasi in città.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira - Oasi in città.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira - Tanzen Mit Righeira 1984.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira - Tanzen Mit Righeira 1984.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira -Compañero.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira -Compañero.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnson Righeira - Bianca Surf 1981.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Johnson Righeira - Bianca Surf 1981.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira - Gli parlerò di te.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira - Gli parlerò di te.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Triad (album) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Triad (album), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~StyyxTalk? 23:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Navboxes edit

Make sure when you create navboxes like the one you did for Template:Orup, that you add it to all the articles you listed in the navbox. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:55, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Triad - Triad.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Triad - Triad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:La Bionda 1980.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:La Bionda 1980.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira 1983.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira 1983.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira - Bambini Forever (song).jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira - Bambini Forever (song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira - Hey Mama.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira - Hey Mama.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira - Italians a Go-Go.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira - Italians a Go-Go.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira - La musica electronica.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira - La musica electronica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Righeira - Tanzen Mit Righeira.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Righeira - Tanzen Mit Righeira.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Janne Lucas 1980.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Janne Lucas 1980.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainers from Huddinge edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainers from Huddinge indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainers from Lund edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainers from Lund indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainers from Norrköping edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainers from Norrköping indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reverts edit

There was nothing wrong with this edit to the Johnson Righeira article. Please be more careful with your reverts or please explain why you did revert. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:27, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Riks for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

gidonb (talk) 22:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Markus (singer) edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Markus (singer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Vamos a la playa (Righeira song) edit

The article Vamos a la playa (Righeira song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vamos a la playa (Righeira song) and Talk:Vamos a la playa (Righeira song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 21:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Triad (album) edit

  Hello, Tomaten05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Triad (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Vamos a la playa (Righeira song) edit

The article Vamos a la playa (Righeira song) you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Vamos a la playa (Righeira song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian people convicted of drug offences edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian people convicted of drug offences indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Markus (singer) edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Markus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Triad (album) edit

 

Hello, Tomaten05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Triad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Righeira tracks edit

 Template:Righeira tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Michael Righeira 1987.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Michael Righeira 1987.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Righeira album track list templates edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Righeira album track list templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

17 år as a single edit

Hi! I just realized you were the user who changed "17 år" from a single to a song. I have been searching a little bit and it seems the track was released as a radio single somewhere late 2008-early 2009. I have found some links where it is stated that it was even one of the most played songs on radio, which means it is a single! I just need to find the release date, but this is what I have found so far:

Paparazzzi (talk) 04:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Esquire Records singles edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Esquire Records singles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian pop rock songs edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian pop rock songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ricchi e Poveri - Se m'innamoro.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ricchi e Poveri - Se m'innamoro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ryan Paris - Dolce Vita.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ryan Paris - Dolce Vita.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive edit

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
 
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Correct order" edit

Regarding this edit summary, the template documentation is only an example. It is not something any user is obligated to follow—certainly not something any user should be going out of their way to change, as you've done—and you claim it's "correct", yet you haven't preserved the spaces between the parameters or anything else about it, just the order of parameters. Most websites, at least all the ones in the Hung Medien series, have the artist listed before the song (in both the URL and on the actual chart listings), so the single chart documentation is contrary to that fact. Ss112 16:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

See MOS:POPMUSIC and don't revert constructive edits without explanation edit

Vocal and instrumental denotations are not part of a song's title per MOS:POPMUSIC: "For titles of works and releases, purely descriptive phrases in parentheses or after dashes, such as "remix", "acoustic version" and "remastered", should not be considered part of song titles and should be placed outside quotation marks." Also, do not revert users without explanation either [1]. Thank you. Ss112 19:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Song recordings produced by Pete Waterman edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Song recordings produced by Pete Waterman indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Song recordings produced by Mike Stock (musician) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Song recordings produced by Mike Stock (musician) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Song recordings produced by Matt Aitken edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Song recordings produced by Matt Aitken indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Turn Red edit

 

The article Turn Red has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don’t see any plausibility of passing WP:GNG or even WP:NSONG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eternal Shadow Talk 20:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Turn Red for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turn Red is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turn Red until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eternal Shadow Talk 04:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you! edit

  Congrats for entering Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits/5001–10000! Keep up your good work! Timothytyy (talk) 12:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Huddinge by occupation has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Huddinge by occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnson Righeira nonfree.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Johnson Righeira nonfree.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 GAN backlog drive edit

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
 
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply