TomahawkHunter

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, TomahawkHunter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 10:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Reverted your revision [1] to People's_Liberation_Army_Air_Force

Hello, I reverted your edits because the links you were providing do not work. I'm sure you noticed that other editors have also reverted your changes. Please do not just re-insert your text if others disagree, take it to the article's talk page. If you have any question, let me know. --McSly (talk) 01:24, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Not useful

I'm backtracking your edits and failing to find anything useful so far. Hcobb (talk) 04:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article DF-31, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hohum 01:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to DF-5. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hohum 01:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to People's Liberation Army Air Force. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hohum 00:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Reverted your revision [2] to People's_Liberation_Army_Air_Force

Hello, Could you stop redoing the same edit over and over again please. The links you provided DO NOT WORK. Your edit will will be reverted every time. Please stop wasting everyone's time. Use the preview button to make sure the links you include actually work, Just do one edit at a time, not the whole thing at once. One last thing, please read the policy on reliable source to make sure that the information can stay. Thank you. --McSly (talk) 02:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Feb 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Type 99. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ThePointblank (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Type 99. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Stop adding a blog and a source which evens says "Source: Unknown" on it's page. You have done this repeatedly for weeks, using the same sources each time. (Hohum ^@) 02:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to People's Liberation Army Air Force. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding blogs as references. You have done this many times, and ignore all advice not to do so. (Hohum ^@) 17:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to People's Liberation Army Air Force, you will be blocked from editing. Translation clearly shows. "Source: Unknown". Please stop adding improperly sourced material, you have been asked this many times. (Hohum ^@) 01:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for continuing to add material sourced to unreliable references, despite repeated warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 06:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ThePointblank (talk) 23:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to DF-41. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Hohum ^@) 11:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to DF-5, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A forum and another wiki are not acceptable sites. Please take notice of these warnings. Your complete disregard of repeated advice about what is WP:RELIABLE is going to get you blocked. (Hohum ^@) 12:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to DF-4, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Hohum ^@) 12:07, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to DF-3A, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Hohum ^@) 12:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to DF-21, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Hohum ^@) 12:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for continuing to add material sourced to unreliable references, despite repeated warnings. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 06:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Xian JH-7. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - The Bushranger (talk) 05:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Type 096 submarine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Hohum ^@) 18:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Type 095 submarine, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Hohum ^@) 19:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and long-term vandalism despite repeated warnings and blocks. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)