This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Who are you edit

who are you?

Image Tagging image:Clivebull.JPG edit

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading image:Clivebull.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.


Please do not vandalize articles. This sort of offense can include inserting nonsense into articles, blanking articles, or otherwise changing articles with obviously unwanted content. This serves no other purpose than creating more work for Wikipedia's editors and administrators. If you do continue, your account and/or IP will be blocked. Kelly Martin 15:53, July 27, 2005 (UTC)


 

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Anti-Anonymex2Come to my page! I've gone caliente loco! 20:43, 27 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Handb logo.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Handb logo.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 talk 03:03, 28 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:033.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:033.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-SCEhardT 00:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please use edit summaries edit

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --talk to JD wants e-mail 00:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --talk to JD wants e-mail 00:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --talk to JD wants e-mail 00:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


 

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tony Blair, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kuru talk 00:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. —Mets501 (talk) 00:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tom b 2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have merely deleted images which are mine, and will sur wikipedia if they use them as they are copyright protected to me!!!

Decline reason:

You are now permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia as it has become clear your account is only being used for vandalism and you are making legal threats on your talk page. --ЯEDVERS 09:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Warning removal edit

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. talk to JD wants e-mail 00:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:ERRENDORE.JPG edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ERRENDORE.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Kings grammar red.JPG edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kings grammar red.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply