February 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Asartea. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Chakora Pulwama, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Asartea Talk | Contribs 07:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Amkgp 💬 17:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation) (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation) (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gpkp [utc] 07:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from onefivenine.com/india/villages/Pulwama/Pulwama/Chakoora. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jack Frost (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation) (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation) (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from onefivenine.com/india/villages/Pulwama/Pulwama/Chakoora. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jack Frost (talk) 09:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chakora Pulwama (March 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. KylieTastic (talk) 14:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ToibBaba! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 14:13, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zahid Tiger (March 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 06:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chakoora Pulwama (March 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 11:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chakoora Pulwama (April 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Ahmetlii. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Chakora, Pulwama—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Ahmetlii (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bro plz help me, to Solve this problem User:ToibBaba|ToibBaba]] ([[User talk:ToibBaba|talk]]). (talk) 19:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

The draft is at Draft:Chakoora Pulwama; the other article is about a village in Pakistan. Peter James (talk) 09:00, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello ToibBaba. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Chakoora Pulwama, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ToibBaba. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ToibBaba|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Your email to me suggests that you are only interested in promoting this entity Fiddle Faddle 13:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Chakoora Pulwama, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:ToibBaba, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ToibBaba|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Fiddle Faddle 14:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

You must make a statement here. Emailing me is no use. Fiddle Faddle 14:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Chakoora Pulwama, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You keep adding irrelevant and useless categories. I have reverted your most recent additions. This is disruptive editing and must stop, please Fiddle Faddle 18:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chakoora Pulwama has been accepted

edit
 
Chakoora Pulwama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 09:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you soo much User:ToibBaba|ToibBaba]] ([[User talk:ToibBaba|talk]]). (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chakoora Pulwama (April 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your article is not showing in Google?

edit

Your question should be directed to Google, not to me and not by email. Fiddle Faddle 13:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why my Article named "Chakoora Pulwama" not showing in Google,Why? User:ToibBaba|ToibBaba]] ([[User talk:ToibBaba|talk]]). (talk) 13:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why my Article named "Chakoora Pulwama" Not showing in Google, why? Please tell me Reason? User:ToibBaba|ToibBaba]] ([[User talk:ToibBaba|talk]]). (talk) 14:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Now , you can check my Talk page, Iam not Any Paid user User:ToibBaba|ToibBaba]] ([[User talk:ToibBaba|talk]]). (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

New article not indexed

edit

In response to your question about Chakoora Pulwama not being indexed there are two things causing this. The more significant is discussed at WP:INDEXING and is that new articles aren't indexed for 90 days (more accurately WP adds a header value to new articles for 90 days asking Google to not index it yet.) This allows time for the new article to be reviewed and for its content to stabilize. After the 90 expires there is then variable amount of time before Google scans Wikipedia and updates its database. RJFJR (talk) 17:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation)

edit

  Hello, ToibBaba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Chakora Pulwama (disambiguation)

edit
 

Hello, ToibBaba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chakora Pulwama".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Panzgam Pulwama

edit

  Hello, ToibBaba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Panzgam Pulwama, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Government Higher Secondary school Chakoora Pulwama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Block notice

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 16:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply