Your submission at Articles for creation: Creutz & Partners (May 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tobi.energy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Creutz & Partners edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Creutz & Partners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Villa Louise (Aachen) (May 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 08:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Villa Louise (Aachen), you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad and thankful you checked my article. Will check all the remarks and update it as soon as possible. Will take some more time for a second application! Tobi.energy (talk) 16:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Tobi.energy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Villa Louise (Aachen), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orangemike, to be fair to Tobi.energy, at 12:01, 6 May, they disclosed on their user page that they were being paid to write for the company that owns [[Villa Louise. -- Hoary (talk) 05:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Exactly. I was being paid for articles but the one for this page is a free on top practice, because I think that this one is the thing that definitely belongs to Wikipedia due to the historical building, the arts inside and the high-class guest chefs. Will update it soon. Thank you both for you comments! This helps a lot. Tobi.energy (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website – I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 20:12, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the heads up. It is my actual nickname in real life too, but you are so right – it still also serves as my url. Already requested a change. Thank you! Tobi.energy (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Villa Louise (Aachen) edit

  Hello, Tobi411. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Villa Louise (Aachen), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply