Tlm0101

April 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Karina Lombard—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

I updated the most recent picture of Karina Lombard. So why I can't post it in the place of the old picture? Tlm0101 (talk) 14:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Karina Lombard. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Tlm0101. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Karina Lombard, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You've made no edit on any other topic. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Karina Lombard for identical edits to COI indef-blocked sockdrawer Tzarinak / Lombard Officiel.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

{{unblock those profiles @CorbieVreccan| You made a big mistake! All those profiles: Tzarinak / Lombard Officiel, and tlm0101 , are the official profiles, of the official representatives of the actress. That they are the only ones that the actress has permission to edit about her. But here on Wikipedia, anyone including robots is entitled to edit, ban and even block profiles, without wanting to know if the person is authorized or not to edit by the official profile owner. ~~~~}} Tlm0101 (talk) 00:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi KL. You disclosed your COI in this edit summary when logged in to the Tzarinak profile.[1] Again, read Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest policy, and note that all the edits by all of your accounts have been reverted by editors in good standing, not just for COI but for being unsourced, and in other ways not being encyclopedic content. Additionally, please read the Sockpuppet policy, which you have now admitted to violating with these multiple accounts, as well. So, I'm adding this profile to the sockblock. I'm sorry this didn't work out for you, but we all have to follow the rules here. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for self-promotion. I wish you all the best, but this is not the place for the content you are trying to post. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 03:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

@CorbieVreccan No one here is doing the self-promotion, different about you are saying, I didn't know that Wikipedia only works with half truths and untrustworthy third-party sources.

I thought the purpose of Wikipedia was to get the truth out of people through Biographies and Facts. All this team is doing is altering third-party sources, which put interview lines and unreliable sources, into the real source. It's very easy to put anything in someone else's biography on the internet. I want to see put the truth with facts and reliable sources. Tlm0101 (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)