Tjmacpherson85
October 2021 edit
I strongly advise you to familiarize yourself with editing policy, especially on the importance of sourcing (WP:V) and not adding your own editorial perceptions in the name of "clarification" (MOS:EDITORIAL). I appreciate the fact that you want to share in making Wikipedia a better project, but perhaps you should pause to reflect that the many editors before you may already have thought of and rejected the kind of changes you are making. At Secondhand Lions, for example, pointing out that a 14-year-old will, after 17 years, be "now grown" is superfluous, especially in a WP:FILMPLOT section where there is a verbal limit. Sweetpool50 (talk) 06:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with writing styles. The article was badly written as it stood. Many poor editing decisions are ignored or blindly defended while clarifications in writing are covered up by one layer after another of terrible decisions with writing. You seem to be making too many of your own "editorial perceptions" in the name of "editing policy." added: 07:56, 17 October 2021 Tjmacpherson85 talk contribs
Well, I'm sorry for the self-righteous line you're taking, @TJM. As I said, your input could be valuable if you'd bear in mind that WP is a co-operative venture. However, I notice that most of your film edits over the past year have been undone. Could you find it in your heart to question whether it's not just the fault of everyone else? It might be a good idea too to learn how to sign your posts. Sweetpool50 (talk) 12:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
(Redacted)
March 2022 edit
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Beyond the Black Rainbow, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:10, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Please quit thinking you are more important than you are. It was a poorly written page with incomplete and misleading information. This page isn't art -- it was misleading garbage. Everything there was 100% accurate.
- I'm sorry you think you know how to edit anything.
- "Ninja Robot Pirate" -- what a joke. Tjmacpherson85 (talk) 18:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, you may be blocked from editing. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- I restored information that was correct. Tjmacpherson85 (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
BLP discretionary sanctions alert edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- You should change your name to "self-important cyberstalker" since you're so bent on accuracy. Tjmacpherson85 (talk) 19:07, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)